Skip to content
Legal Business
Twitter Logo Email Icon Youtube Circle Icon Facebook Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon Google+ Circle Icon
Newsletter Subscribe App Trial
Menu
  • Blog
    • Freshfields Bruckhaus DeringerFreshfields partner exits following internal conduct probeNathalie Tidman
    • Michael DavisonSome joy for UK partnership as Hogan Lovells board backs City-based litigation chief as deputy CEOMarco Cillario
    • dejonghe_wim_allen_overyDejonghe to stand again as A&O senior partner as six leadership hopefuls revealedNathalie Tidman
    • Justin D’AgostinoCharismatic and strategic: HSF names Asia managing partner and disputes leader D’Agostino as CEOThomas Alan
    • City of LondonKirkland alumni gets nod as Sidley promotes two in London following 30-strong promotion roundMarco Cillario
    • More Blogs
    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • Analysis
      • napalm in the classroomRegime change – The scorched-earth approach to legal education reform
      • line-upFull disclosure – How to resolve the profession’s #MeToo problem
      • Denise Gibson and Charles HayesThe Global 100 debate – Decision time
      • Peter HassonLeadership pivots and partner exits highlight a period of flux for Clydes – what next for the insurance giant?
      • Adam Freeman‘There are Formula 1 drivers and other drivers’ – who’s winning the race for London’s lev fin work?
        • Law firm financial data

          Access the full range of Legal Business financial reports, including  The LB100 and Global 100 – comprehensive coverage of the largest law firms in the world by revenue.

          Disputes hub


          Head to the LB Disputes hub for focused Disputes coverage, including news, events, analysis, comment and the latest Disputes Yearbook.

      • Sponsored briefing: Legal tech – Too much of a good thing?
      • New tricks – Can law firms beat New Law disruptors at their own game?
      • Our corporate soul – Defining the values of a law firm
      • Law Tech Special – Autumn
      • Cross-border M&A: Asian bidders usher in different mindset
      • Firms pile into fast-moving corporate crime sphere but is there enough work to keep all hands busy?
      • More analysis
    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • Insight
      • Law Tech: GC readers manualSponsored briefing: Legal tech – Too much of a good thing?Guest Blog
      • Tunnel diverThe New GC Toolkit: New game, new rules, new playersLegal Business
      • banks_peter_partnershipThe Path to Partnership: A Special ReportLegal Business
      • digital mapInternational Arbitration Insight: Bigger, longer, more complicatedJames Wood
      • Brexit close to finalThe edge of the cliff – Brexit response for worried GCsJames Wood
    • More Insight
    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • Comment
        • novarese_alex2020 forecast: City giants forced to offer flexible partnership
        • Unheralded comes regulation of City law
        • If A&O’s new team can’t get a mandate, who can?
        • Letter from… Brussels: Brexit convulsions prove no problem for Brussels hands as the age of tough antitrust enforcement proves a boon
        • Deal View: Freshfields silences critics with four-piece Cleary team but can it keep up the pressure on Wall St?
        • The Last Word: The client view
      • More Comment
    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • News review
      • Julian StaitSponsored briefing: Taking the plungeChris Crowe
      • Julie Brannan‘Getting access to the talent’ – The profession struggles to react as sweeping training reform loomsThomas Alan
      • Jeremy DrewRPC’s surprise partnership shake-up signals focus on next generation but is the firm still playing too safe?Marco Cillario
      • Julie SmythThree firms cut as National Grid unveils panel following ‘pay to play’ review and BAE loses longstanding legal chiefAnna Cole-Bailey
      • Baker McKenzie; LB295 Dec 2019/Jan 2020A boon for Global London firms on big-ticket buyouts as US investors target hot tech assetsNathalie Tidman
    • More news review
    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • International
        • Africa
            • suitcase with African stickersAfrica rising – Foreign firms strive to cover the booming continent
            • waking_the_elephant_africaLegal leaders in Africa: Waking the elephant
            • city railway illustrationLaying the foundations – lawyers scramble as demand for African infra booms
            • GC Powerlist Africa Teams

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Africa

        • Cyprus
            • Cyprus doveA new hope for Cyprus’s recession-battered lawyers
            • Cyprus flag puzzleCyprus: Picking up the pieces
            • black dog howling at grungey Cyprus flagReturn of the black dog – Hard times return for Cyprus’ legal community
            • GC Powerlist: Greece and Cyprus Teams

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Cyprus

        • Iberia
          • madrid 3Letter from Iberia – Despite turbulent politics, Madrid lawyers sustain bullish mood
          • Richter ScaleIberia: Off the Richter scale
          • old treasure mapHunting El Dorado – Iberian firms keep their eyes on prizes at home and abroad
          • GC Powerlist: Iberia Teams

            The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Portugal

            The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Spain

        • Ireland
            • DublinIreland: Follow the money
            • Businessman running to DublinIreland: A case to make
            • Ireland Emerald AmbitionsEmerald Ambitions
            • GC Powerlist: Ireland Teams

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Ireland

        • Israel
            • Tel AvivIsrael: Anti-fragile
            • Man walking on tightrope over Tel AvivIn the game – Israeli law firms embrace risks to secure the tech icons of tomorrow
            • Tel Aviv tech styleValue range – as the money pours in, can Israel takes its high-growth stars global?
            • The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Israel

        • Middle East
            • PrintThe Middle East: The rough with the crude
            • RiyadhMiddle East: Mission unaccomplished
            • Offshore oil rig with stock market overlayHolding steady – A turbulent Middle East market separates the committed from the faint-hearted
            • GC Powerlist: Middle East Teams

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Middle East

        • Offshore
          • UK cliff edgeOffshore: Deal or no deal?
          • protests in Hong KongOffshore: The unsilent majority
          • Under Pressure IllustrationOffshore leaders’ year in review: Under pressure
        • Russia
            • bear on russian flag illustrationRousing the bear – Russian counsel force to hunt in new places
            • frozen cityThe Russia report: A new thaw?
            • Propaganda-style posterAboard the propaganda train – sweat and spin amid a turbulent Russian market
            • GC Powerlist: Russia Teams

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Russia

        • Switzerland
            • Eu rock with Swiss flag in creviceSwitzerland – Between a rock and a hard place
            • mountain skierSwitzerland – The rough and the smooth
            • boat with Swiss flagMaking ripples – Turbulent times ahead for the Swiss legal market
            • GC Powerlist: Switzerland

              The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Switzerland

        • Turkey
          • turkey5Turkey – Back from the brink
          • bridging-the-gapTurkey – Bridging the Gap
          • turkey2Leading ladies
          • GC Powerlist: Turkey Teams

            The Legal 500 law firm rankings: Turkey

        • The Euro Elite 2019
          • The Euro Elite 100 table excerptThe Euro Elite 100
          • EU island fortressThe Euro Elite Methodology
          • EU island fortress in the rainThe Euro Elite Overview: Life in the bubble
          • The Euro Elite Top 25 table excerptThe Euro Elite Top 25
          • Paris in pinkThe Euro Elite: France – La vie en rose
          • Brian O’GormanThe Euro Elite: Market overviews
      • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • In-House
      • Matt WilsonThe In-House Survey: Blurred lines – the GC as business leaderAnna Cole-Bailey
      • panel discussionThe Scots GC debate: Force multipliersHamish McNicol
      • Anneliese ReinholdFrom start-up to established: du-ing it the right wayAlex Speirs
      • Logo for the GC Powerlist Series

        Powerlists

        Nominations

      • Available Now…

        Italy Teams 2019

        The most influential and innovative in-house teams working in Italy…

        Switzerland Teams 2019

        The most influential and innovative in-house teams working in Switzerland…

    • SUBSCRIBE TO LEGAL BUSINESS
  • Awards
      • LB Awards 2018 tablesPhotos from The Legal Business Awards
      • sponsorSponsors
      • 5DA_1362Contacts – The Legal Business Awards
  • Events
    • Previous Events


      GC Summit Ukraine

      Sponsors: PwC, Evris Law, Redcliffe Partners Date: 31 October 2019 Time: 08.30-14.00 Location: Fairmont Grand Hotel Kyiv, 1 Naberezhno-Khreschatytska Street, Kyiv, Ukraine 04070

      Private Practice Powerlist: Mexico Specialists

      Sponsor: Gonzalez Calvillo Date: 31 October 2019 Time: 19.00-22.00 Location: Spyglass Rooftop Bar, 47 W 38th St, New York, NY 10018, USA

      Upcoming Events


      The Financial Regulatory and Disputes Summit 2020 – 6 February 2020

      London, United Kingdom

      06/02/2020

      Corporate and M&A Summit 2020 – 2 March 2020

      London, United Kingdom

      02/03/2020

      Tech Event – Re-inventing legal delivery in a digital world 2020

      London, United Kingdom

      18/03/2020

      All Events
Analysis > Disputes Yearbook 2018

The Silk Round: One fine day

It is a remarkable day for any advocate when they make silk. LB caught up with two friends who made the grade this year to get the story behind those little letters

Posted on 17 May 2018 09:30am17 May 2018 11:59am
Tom Baker
Disputes Yearbook 2018 Latham & WatkinsStephenson Harwood Dispute resolution

Legal Business writes many high-minded pieces focused on the finer analytical points of the legal industry. This is not one of those pieces.

In an intensively people-driven business like the law, there cannot be many more resonant and personal experiences than becoming a Queen’s Counsel (QC). Firstly, there is the trial of the arduous application process and the agonising wait to find if you have secured the favour of peers and the selection panel.

If successful, then awaits the surreal-yet-magical formal ceremony, this year held on Monday 26 February, in which the hatchling QCs are required to march to Ede & Ravenscroft to fit themselves out in the storied attire. That surreal mood was heightened this year by a ceremony in Central London occurring during a snow storm.

The 119 successful applications announced in December included two old friends, arbitrators Sophie Lamb at Latham & Watkins and Stephenson Harwood’s Louis Flannery. We sat down with the chalk-and-cheese pair to get the inside track on the realities and joys of putting those two coveted letters after your name.

***

LB: In the most recent round, women were more successful on average than men. Why do you think that is?

Sophie Lamb QC (SL): Positive experiences encourage others to apply. The process is exacting and overwhelming. The way your book looks in these couple of years running up to your application is vital. Having positive stories and statistics is hugely important in terms of encouraging diverse candidates in the broadest sense to apply. There is evidence generally that women tend to put themselves forward where they feel confident that they will succeed.

‘It’s your entire professional life experience in a very limited number of characters. They’ll be doing it by Twitter in five years’ time.’
Sophie Lamb QC

LB: Who did you tell first?

SL: I told my parents and my husband was with me, but it didn’t go beyond that. The initials are so coveted I didn’t want to do the slightest thing that could jeopardise it happening.

LB: Has QC always been the goal?

SL: I spent most of my professional career within law firms, but I trained as a barrister, so since the very beginning the ultimate goal was to become one of Her Majesty’s counsel learned in law. As much as being a partner in a wonderful law firm is a great privilege, as an advocate, being a QC is the ultimate endorsement.

LB: Why does it matter?

SL: That kite mark of quality and experience is genuinely recognised and valued as currency all over the world.

It’s not just a personal milestone, but also it’s one of UK plc’s great exports. The value of English law, the quality of our profession – these are things that are greatly revered across the world. So to even have the smallest connection with that is appreciated by a great many people.

LB: Were you put off by the application process?

SL: I made the mistake of looking at a form in the past. It’s a very long form – about 64 pages once you factor in the references – but it’s helpful in that it provides you with a matrix that allows you to track whether you have the right cross-mix of competencies and experiences, so that you are a genuine contender.

Entering the Royal Courts for the 2018 silks ceremony

‘You’re in the photos of at least 100 tourists. You put your costume on in the morning and it’s like: “Really?” By the afternoon, you’re walking down Fleet Street with your wig and it’s very natural.’
Sophie Lamb QC

One of the things that’s been interesting for Louis and I, as well as others who came up through the international arbitration community is that, by and large, our referees don’t come from the same pool as those now-silks who now practice English litigation. Traditionally the committee would only have been influenced by judges and retired judges. We are bringing a new body of referees into this system, be it judges from international tribunals or academics from leading European institutions, which is making it more inclusive.

LB: Does it help to have a law firm background?

SL: I’ve grown up in a hybrid role of being both the client’s lawyer and an advocate. By necessity we only do a smaller number of cases as counsel compared to barristers because we are playing a number of roles. The book you need to present to be a contender will look different to the book of a banking silk.

What it shows is the committee recognises you can demonstrate excellence in a number of ways and the fact that you haven’t done 15 cases in two years doesn’t mean that you haven’t had the same amount of experience.

Louis Flannery QC (LF): I’ve heard of a solicitor QC who got it on eight cases. I had a coach and was told that eight is pushing it, nine is just about OK, ten’s alright, 11’s good and 12 is perfect. You have to have a matrix of 12 judicial referees, eight professional referees (which are opponents or people you’ve led), and six clients. So it’s 26 referees. Suddenly if you’ve got 19 referees the matrix doesn’t look so good.

The biggest headache of the form is just organising that matrix so that all your referees are in the right place. Their selection process is apparently random; they go for at least one of your top two in each category and then they randomly take either a J5 or P3 [J = judicial, P = professional] and then they take three more. So they take about nine for each candidate. The people they pick are completely random so you can’t stick someone down in the corner and hope they don’t get noticed. I got stiffed by a referee [for the previous year’s silk round]. What an idiot! ‘I took you out for lunch and you said you’d support my application. You lied to me, brother!’

SL: After the fact I spoke to one of my judge assessors. He said that he was so thrilled to receive an application from a solicitor-advocate. He was very alive to the fact that it was difficult for solicitors to get those right cases, and be given the sorts of endorsements the committee is looking for. I feel that he went the extra mile for me, so I do believe the system works. It could be more inclusive generally speaking, but that’s a different question.

‘Everybody said it would be such a great day and you’ll have so much fun, and we did. It was magical. I felt like Cinderella.’
Louis Flannery QC

LB: How long did it take each of you to complete the application process?

LF: Hoo! At least a hundred hours.

SL: Months, yeah.

LF: You’ve got to write an overall practice blurb, describing your practice. That’s 4,000 characters, including spaces and full stops. I made the mistake of writing 4,000 words the first time.

SL: It’s your entire professional life experience in a very limited number of characters. They’ll be doing it by Twitter in five years’ time.

LF: My J1 was a High Court judge. And I didn’t know until after I got silk that he played a major role in producing the form that was used from 2006, when he was a QC with another judge. The two of them are on the committee and they adopted a civil service-type form and transported it across.

So my J1 knew the form backwards and therefore knew what to put in it to make the application look good! Outsiders might think judges prefer barristers to solicitors, but I approached three judges and they were all enthusiastic.

LB: Do they want to support solicitors?

LF: I don’t think they’re particularly biased to either stream. Most of the Commercial Court now know that we do our advocacy in more focused applications. I couldn’t do a two-week hearing; it’s an immense burden. To run your caseload and your practice around a two-week trial, a barrister has the luxury to be on brief and shut everything else out for two weeks. I struggle on a week’s hearing.

SL: I don’t think people outside of what we do appreciate just how onerous it is to be an advocate in your cases and to be the lawyer to the client as well. After each day of hearing, the client wants to have a proper debrief. You can’t say: ‘Look, I find your concerns interesting, but I have to prepare my cross examination.’

But I genuinely think we have the advantage in those cases. We’ve developed the facts and the strategy with our clients from the beginning. No-one is more familiar with those cases than we are. We are totally in the moment in those cases by the time the hearing arises.

LB: How were you feeling the night before the ceremony?

LF: Fucking elated.

SL: Weirdly nervous, but having been so thrilled and excited the night before – I don’t know if it was the solemnity of it all – it really caught up with me. The ceremony in Westminster Hall and how important and formal and the history surrounding it all… there was a wobbly-chin moment. Not much breakfast was consumed.

Louis Flannery QC

‘You are told to buy white gloves that you are not allowed to wear. Woe betide you if you put them on and do a Michael Jackson!’
Louis Flannery QC

I sat next to Reza [Mohtashami, who was also appointed as a silk] from Freshfields [Bruckhaus Deringer]. We were called next to each other, so I had a friend. My name is on his letter’s patent, because the person called before you is listed in your own letter’s patent from the Queen.

LF: Every QC in history has been called after another QC. So there’s a strict order. On the day we’re each given a strict order from one to 126 and whatever number you are, your name appears on the letter’s patent of the next person. The first person on the list will have the name of the last person called from last year’s list.

In theory she calls advisers in order of seniority. She’s got to find the oldest alive silk. Someone who’s officially dead. Everybody said it would be such a great day and you’ll have so much fun, and we did. It was magical. I felt like Cinderella.

SL: You go to Ede & Ravenscroft to have your appointments to try on and see what you can hire. I was among the last in the queue – they only had one or two wigs left that were quite old. A lot of the clerks in the commercial sets rallied around and Fountain Court came up trumps in the end. One of the barristers there collects random bits of memorabilia and he had this amazing wig from some old duffer who you can do a big Wikipedia search on. He was clearly a bit of a character. I had his wig and his big wig box. It was another bizarre and special element of the day.

They don’t make enough of these costumes for women, so often you can’t hire all aspects of it; you have to pay to have them made. There should be a discussion about how to make that aspect of the ceremony more inclusive.

LB: How much does it cost?

SL: Many thousands. And that’s aside from the application process.

LF: When you first send off the form, it’s a £1,800 non-refunded fee. Then if you’re in need of a coach, like I was, that’s a couple of grand. Then you get your letter by email on 14 December. A week later you get an invoice arrive for £3,864, which is £3,000 plus VAT for the balance of the application fee, plus £264 for the letter’s patent, which is an awfully drab document with the print coming off.

SL: Was that not just because you spilt beer over it?

LF: No! It’s a disappointingly crappy document. It’s got a Starbucks angel seal, no signature or anything. Very bland. Came in a vogue-red plastic envelope too.

SL: My daughter thought that was the best bit. ‘Oh, you got a sticker from the Queen!’

‘The official photograph is the one they’ll use when I get done for some inappropriate offence committed in 1992 at the SJ Berwin Christmas party. It’s the one The Times will stick on page three. So you’ve got to look not guilty.’
Louis Flannery QC

LF: My son has taken it into school to show his friends! I know I spent north of £2,000 but south of £3,000 on the gear. And I hired some frills and spills. £295 for shoes you only wear once, unless you go to the Lord Chancellor’s for breakfast. My best friend from the age of six got made up the same day. He’s a criminal silk from Nottingham and he borrowed every single bit of his costume from someone else in chambers.

Related  Sponsored briefing: Excessive litigation - how can it be discouraged and stopped?

SL: There was someone whose mate was a couple [of places] behind him in the queue and they were wearing the same gown, so the man went first then came out and quickly swapped it with him!

LF: The day is superb. My flat’s on Fetter Lane, so I got the limo to pick up Anya and the children from Hampstead, parked in the Inner Temple, had some photos in the snowstorm, then we put the nanny and the children in the Savoy. We joined the procession down to the House of Lords. Tom Macey-Dare [QC] at Quadrant Chambers was in the car next to us in a lovely Rolls-Royce.

That’s the lovely thing. When you realise you’re taking ages to get to the House of Lords, you don’t realise you’re in a procession of hundreds of limos, all going in to the Lords for one purpose only. There’s this sense of 100 weddings happening at once.

SL: Everyone’s outside with their family posing, the amazing cars, the tourists are everywhere. I stayed at the One Aldwych hotel that weekend with my family, and so our car came and we had this beautiful old Daimler. By the time we came down to the car there were about ten or 15 tourists waiting to see. I assume they thought it was a wedding, but this woman dressed as a man in a weird outfit comes out! You must be in the photos of at least 100 random tourists at one point. You start off in the morning putting your costume on and it’s like: “Really?” By the afternoon, you’re walking down Fleet Street with your wig on and it’s become very natural.

LF: When you’re inside Westminster Hall, you sit in the front bit. All your family and friends are in the back bit. You get called one by one in order of seniority. I was waiting ages for you [Lamb]!

SL: It’s because you’re so young! [laughs]

LF: Jern-Fei [Ng] from Essex Court was about second to last, the bastard. The youngest come last. My best friend from school was number 13. I was 22. Your name is called up, you get your red envelope, you say: ‘I do solemnly declare’, then you walk up some stairs and you wait for the next person to come up. After about 80 more people come up, it gets crowded. After a while you start thinking: ‘Come on hurry up.’

Louis Flannery QC

‘I said to my mates: “We’ve got an announcement coming and we’re either going to need the champagne or we’re going to deserve it.”’
Louis Flannery QC

SL: You start wishing that you don’t have someone with seven middle names.

LF: And then there’s a group photo. You get an official photograph outside, which is the one they’ll use when I get done for some inappropriate offence committed in 1992 at the SJ Berwin Christmas party. It’s the one The Times will stick on page three. So you’ve got to look not guilty.

SL: A non-trivial number of people stumbled over their limited words in Westminster Hall, or bowed the wrong way. Her Majesty will be very disappointed to know that some of her counsel could not remember to bow left or right.

LB: You must play that moment over in your head so much that I can imagine getting it wrong on the day.

SL: Well, considering half of the words you need to remember were your own name, it was quite an achievement!

LF: It says: ‘I Louis Kruschev Flannery do so solemnly declare,’ so I memorised it and thought: ‘It’s going to look shameful if I go up with this bit of paper,’ so I left it on my chair, but a lot of people read it from the paper wrongly!

SL: The Lord Chancellor has an enormous sword.

LF: I got a call on the Friday from a clerk, who said: ‘I’m going to be staring at your arse a lot on Monday,’ because his barrister was directly behind me in the queue. The clerk goes with the barrister. He had come round, lent over and said to his barrister on the Monday ‘Project!’, and then he disappeared. My friend looked round at me and said: ‘Right, I’m going to project.’ So Clive went up to the microphone and gave it everything. The whole hall woke up.

SL: It diffused what was becoming an overwhelmingly serious moment.

Sophie Lamb QC

‘My daughter thought that was the best bit. “Oh, you got a sticker from the Queen!”’
Sophie Lamb QC

LF: Yes, I boomed in sympathy. I even did a little dance up the stairs.

LB: Did you find it a bit silly?

LF: There’s an absurd pantomime aspect to the fact that there are 120 people in 18th century wigs and buckled shoes.

SF: It’s not silly though. It’s just highly unusual and it’s a spectacle. It’s the most amazingly-unique thing about our legal system.

LF: I don’t think they’ll do it in ten years. Because of the whole inclusivity thing, they’re going to say: ‘People literally can’t afford to take silk.’

SL: There does need to be an honest discussion about that.

LF: You are even told to buy white gloves that you are not allowed to wear. You pay your £25 for your white gloves. Woe betide you if you put them on and do a Michael Jackson!

SL: Yes, it’s treason.

LF: The pageantry is brilliant. I must have known at least a dozen people. To have my best friend in the world sitting in front of me and going through the whole day with me – it was brilliant.

The biblical snowstorm too – it was cold and then it just went bfff, then there was snow and then there was sunshine… and the fact that we [Lamb and I] bumped into each other on the steps, because Brendan, your photographer, was loitering around and I was going: ‘I don’t know where Sophie is!’ But then she turned up. Brendan came into the pub with us afterwards.

The other thing is that the family get to see the inside of a courtroom when you go back to the Rolls Building and they get to see human faces. They’re all wigs, but all the judges are beaming. There is a sense of: ‘Wow, I’m in an exclusive club.’

SL: I just remember going to sleep that evening, and lying in bed and thinking: ‘How on Earth did all that happen?’ and then having the sweetest possible dream.

LF: I got my initials on my door this morning.

SL: Mine are on my email.

LF: It was a lovely day. The whole thing was the closest a man can get to being a bride. You’re the centre of attention, you’re dressed up, your family are there…

‘The Savoy bar has made a cocktail after me. The Louis Flannery QC cocktail is a man’s drink. The head barman at the American Bar in the Savoy is godfather to my son.’
Louis Flannery QC

Afterwards we went back to the Savoy hotel for drinks and then I was in a bar until one in the morning. There’s a bar called CellarDoor, next to Sophie’s hotel, and downstairs is a burlesque bar where they have a transvestite on Monday night. I said as a joke that I’m going to go there in full garb. I’d gone there the week before to scout it out. I went with three of my closest friends and we had a blast. It was just fantastic. I was wigged up.

LB: You told your family you were going to the bar?

LF: Oh yeah. The acts are stand-up comedians who were in drag but are also good singers. It was a lovely end to the day. The singer was asking me to do a duet with her, but I was so plastered by that point. I could barely remember it.

The Savoy bar has made a cocktail after me. You can go to the Savoy American Bar and ask for a Louis Flannery QC and they will make you a cocktail. It’s whiskey, calvados, lemon juice, bitters… 9am next morning: first case as QC.

LB: You must have been feeling delicate.

LF: I sent an email at 7:30am explaining I was delayed and would need to start at 11 or 12. They probably knew I was hungover. But I got a great success at the mediation and got taken out for dinner that night.

The Louis Flannery QC cocktail is a man’s drink. The head barman at the American Bar in the Savoy is godfather to my son.

LB: Purely from the fact that he is a barman?

LF: I met him when he was just starting at The Connaught Hotel in 2008. We became good friends quickly, but then amazingly he started going out with somebody who I knew was in international arbitration. When the lawyer was quizzing me on the identity of her boyfriend, he was the last name that came to mind. The irony to all this is that out of all the women in the world, he should pick the one who had the name Margarita. You couldn’t make it up.

I must have paid for about 30 of the Louis Flannery QC cocktails to be made on Monday night for my family. They were going down a treat.

LB: How do you get a cocktail named after you?

LF: Of all the benefits of becoming a QC, that’s probably the best – if I were sitting down with my grandchildren now, I would say: ‘Listen, when I was in the game, I was alive and kicking. They made cocktails after me.’

When I got the news I blubbed like a bloody baby. I was relieved. When I didn’t get it last year, I was very angry. I had been stiffed by a referee, but also because of the negative comments. I could have explained those negative comments but was given no opportunity to do it.

This year at the interview, they asked if I had any other questions and I said: ‘Yes, is there anything negative in any of the comments I should be given the opportunity to address?’

When I got out I phoned a good friend of mine. He asked: ‘How did it go?’ and I said: ‘The only thing missing from that was three whiskies and a fireplace. I was waiting for the curveball. It never came. After about 35 minutes they said: “We’d like to carry on, but we’re running a bit behind.” It was extremely friendly.’

I knew from my coach that when you get through to the interview you’re graded A or B. You get an A to E grade when your form goes in and they collect your assessments. E is you’re out, D you’re out, C you’re out just, B is in you’re in, just, and A you’re a shoo-in. I must have been graded B last time, because I was in but only just. I felt looking back this time I must have been A because they didn’t throw anything testing at me.

On the day [the silk appointments were announced], 14 December, I’d arranged to have a long lunch with a couple of mates. I went into the restaurant on Fetter Lane at 13:30, checked the QCA [QC appointments] website and there was no update. At 3:30, I checked again and it said ‘announcement coming at 4pm’. I was thinking: I’ve got 25 minutes, I’m already a bit hammered – might as well get the fizz ready! I said to my mates: ‘We’ve got an announcement coming and we’re either going to need the champagne or we’re going to deserve it.’ At two minutes past, everyone got it in their inbox. I ended up back in the Savoy again that night.

tom.baker@legalease.co.uk

Snapshots from the 2018 silks ceremony

Return to the Disputes Yearbook 2018 menu

+1
Tweet
Share
Share
Pin
  • Subscriber Login

  • Latest Issue

    LB295 cover

    • Regime change – The scorched-earth approach to legal education reform
    • Full disclosure – How to resolve the profession’s #MeToo problem
    • The In-House Survey: Blurred lines – the GC as business leader
    • The Global 100 debate – Decision time
    • Leadership pivots and partner exits highlight a period of flux for Clydes – what next for the insurance giant?
    • ‘There are Formula 1 drivers and other drivers’ – who’s winning the race for London’s lev fin work?
    • The Scots GC debate: Force multipliers
    • Turkey – Back from the brink
    • Africa rising – Foreign firms strive to cover the booming continent
    • Life During Law: Segun Osuntokun
  • Related by topic

    Disputes Yearbook 2018: Ready for its close up
  • Related by topic

    Offshore disputes: Centre of the cyclone
  • Related content

    Louis Flannery
    Latham and SH cheer as latest silk round bountiful for Red Lion and Garden Court
    City of London
    Revolving doors: Latham revisits CC for finance hire as DLA recruits BCLP duo in London
    latham ship illustration
    City promotions drop for Latham in US-driven partnership round
  • Most read this week

    1. Comment: Miguel who? New Hogan Lovells chief is going to be a hard sell in Europe
    2. Comment: If A&O’s new leadership team can’t get a mandate, who can?
    3. Dejonghe to stand again as A&O senior partner as six leadership hopefuls revealed
    4. Full disclosure – How to resolve the profession’s #MeToo problem
    5. Legal secretaries and support staff most at risk as industry loses up to 35,000 jobs by 2027

    Analysis

    • Regime change – The scorched-earth approach to legal education reform

    • Full disclosure – How to resolve the profession’s #MeToo problem

    • The Global 100 debate – Decision time

    • Leadership pivots and partner exits highlight a period of flux for Clydes – what next for the insurance giant?

    • ‘There are Formula 1 drivers and other drivers’ – who’s winning the race for London’s lev fin work?

    • Sponsored briefing: Legal tech – Too much of a good thing?

    Useful Links

    • The Legal 500
    • GC Magazine
    • GC Powerlist
    • In-house Lawyer Magazine
    • The Lex 100
    • Legalease Law Journals
    • Legalease Publishing
    • Tax Directors Handbook
    • Practical Lawyer

    © 2019 Legal Business Magazine

    Legalease Ltd, 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

    T: +44 (0)20 7396 9313 | E: subscriptions@legalease.co.uk

    About & Contacts | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Subscriptions