Law firms Sponsored briefing: Administrators’ conflicts of interest – 2018’s hot potato? Guest Blog · 15 May 2019 · 7 min read Legal affairs Disputes Yearbook 2019 Sponsored briefing Marcia Shekerdemian QC considers the decisions in Ve Vegas v Shinners and Zinc Hotels v Beveridge‘An insolvency practitioner should not allow bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others to override professional or business judgments.’1Your limit of 1 article in 30 days is up. Please login for full access or subscribe. Corporate users - click here for simple access (no password needed). For more information, please contact [email protected] Related ContentMore in this categoryQuinn hit with $3m sanction as judge criticises firm for prioritising ‘winning’ over ‘acting ethically’Law firmsEliza Winter21 May 2026‘We would happily do it again’ – Burford shrugs off $16bn Argentina upset, looks to diversifyLaw firmsEliza Winter20 May 2026Law firms targeted by Trump executive orders gear up for court battleLaw firmsAlex Ryan13 May 2026Insights from HSF’s private equity teamLaw firmsLegal Business1 Nov 2024ESG in Switzerland: Schellenberg Wittmer Q&ALaw firmsLegal Business31 Jul 2024‘Clients are not only seeking legal expertise but also looking for firms that practice what they preach’ – ESG Q&A: Herbert Smith FreehillsLaw firmsGuest Blog15 Jul 2024Transatlantic firms outstrip peers on five-year PEP growth, LB100 data revealsLaw firmsAlex Ryan20 Dec 2024The LB100 ranked by PEP: firms push partner profits to new heights as associate pay debate rumbles onLaw firmsAlex Ryan18 Dec 2024A good time to be mid-tier: private equity interest on the rise as mid-market thrivesLaw firmsTom Cox18 Dec 2024