Q&A: Mayora & Mayora

Mayora & Mayora on Honduras’ legal market and its current trends

What are the key legal frameworks and regulations governing dispute resolution in Honduras?

At the heart of the Honduran legal framework lies our Constitution. This foundational document defines the boundaries within which disputes are adjudicated and resolved.

Complementing this bedrock are other legislative pillars such as the Civil, Civil Procedure, and Commercial Codes. A thorough understanding of these instruments, allows us to navigate through the litigation pathway, ensuring that our clients’ interests are safeguarded with utmost diligence.

Other rules related to business are the provisions in the Labour and Tax Codes, meticulously crafted to address the nuances of employment and tax disputes, respectively.

But our legal tools extend beyond mere litigation. The Arbitration Act provides a robust framework, granting the parties expediency in resolving complex commercial disputes, as well as providing the possibility for professional associations and chambers of commerce to organise their own arbitration centres.

Also, Honduras’ commitment to international law adds another layer of complexity to our practice, should we navigate the web of treaties to which Honduras is a signatory.

Can you provide an overview of the current landscape of the disputes legal market in Honduras, including major law firms and key players?

The legal disputes landscape in Honduras has evolved mirroring the country’s economic growth. Litigators have accumulated expertise in oral judicial and arbitration proceedings since the beginning of this century.

Among others, Arias and its distinguished specialist Fanny Rodríguez, stand out for their effective handling of complex commercial disputes. Juan José Alcerro Milla and Enrique Rodríguez Burchard, from Aguilar Castillo Love, have proven to be experts in the area, garnering legitimate recognition. Consortium’s Gustavo León-Gómez, Rafael Rivera Ferrari and Ulises Mejía have positioned themselves as a prestigious team also.

In parallel, boutique law firms, such as those under the leadership of Leonidas Rosa Suazo, Carlos Fortín, Aldo Cocenza, Fabian Villeda and Eugenia Taixes, deserve acknowledgement.

The gradual development of these firms has contributed to spread the culture of arbitration, instilling confidence in the business community.

Some individual practitioners who cater to diverse types of clients and matters before the courts include Maribel Espinoza, Félix Irías Rodezno, Marcio Barahona, and Max Salgado.

Emphasising specialisation, strategic argumentation, and adaptability, these firms and sole practitioners collectively sculpt the Honduran litigation atmosphere.

How is alternative dispute resolution (ADR), such as arbitration and mediation, commonly utilised in Honduras? Are there any recent trends or developments in this area?
Arbitration and mediation in Honduras have emerged as the preferred means for resolving local or international commercial disputes. Consistent with the principles developed by UNCITRAL, arbitration is particularly conspicuous for business transactions.

The joint efforts of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Tegucigalpa (capital city) and that of Cortés (industrial capital city), have significantly promoted arbitration. Proceedings are supervised by each of their arbitration centres (Cortés has recently updated its rules). It is very important to note that the voidance of an arbitral award in Honduras can be submitted to a new arbitral tribunal.

What are the primary types of disputes that businesses and individuals typically encounter in Honduras, and how are these disputes usually addressed through the legal system?
The most common disputes encountered include energy, construction, health, tourism industries, and international trade. All these require sophisticated analysis, prompting tailored counselling to address the unique challenges faced by clients.

The practice of dispute resolution is proportionate to the complexity and economic importance of investments. Compliance, antitrust, insurance, labour and tax matters are usual as well. The crisis on the international transportation of people, cargo, goods, and merchandise, has naturally increased civil and commercial conflicts.

Lastly, as regards to the distribution of imported products, they often lead to disputes over grounds for termination, alongside damages compensation.

What role does technology play in the disputes legal market in Honduras? Are there any advancements or innovations that are shaping the way disputes are handled?
In Honduras, technology plays an insignificant role in litigation, despite gradual improvements following the pandemic.

Collective willingness to embrace technological advances in dispute resolution and adapt traditional practices to meet the imperatives of the digital age, certainly represents an opportunity to increase justice efficiency and accessibility.

How does the legal market in Honduras handle cross-border disputes, and what mechanisms or agreements are in place to facilitate international dispute resolution?
Cross-border litigation in Honduras is managed under several international instruments to which Honduras is a signatory, such as the New York and the Singapore Conventions, in addition to applicable domestic law.

The Arbitration Act of Honduras clearly gives the parties to a cross-border transaction the freedom to submit to international commercial arbitration and to the substantive law of the parties’ choice (not contrary to public order).

Are there specific industry sectors in Honduras that are more prone to disputes, and what unique legal considerations should businesses in those sectors be aware of?

On the side of investment arbitration, as noted above, the energy sector has seen the most cases recently. Regarding commercial arbitration, in our experience, we have noticed a relevant number of disputes related to the construction industry too. Conflicts resulting from private property limits are also constant.

Increase in judicial backlog due to Covid-19 lockdown, discourages its use, thereby evading the search for truth and justice through court or arbitration.

The combination of the above is deemed serious since it may lead to the continuous and unmarked violation of the law or the unfair resolution of disputes, should businesses lean on pacta sunt servanda as the saviour principle of all legal relationships within Honduras.

In light of recent global events or changes in the political and economic landscape, what impact, if any, has there been on the disputes legal market in Honduras?

Globalisation allows that, despite certain weaknesses on the institutional and business environments in Honduras, the country is still the recipient of local and foreign investments.

The biggest investors in Honduras still come from the US and Spain, as well as a few other European and Latin-American countries. Perhaps, Chinese investments are on the horizon, after the recent start of diplomatic bilateral relationships.

Honduras’ legal uncertainty has prompted political turmoil, and the business community is very concerned with this situation.

In the end, litigation demands a confluence of expertise, experience, dedication, and finesse, we must persistently push back and hold the line as lawyers, for the sanctity of justice and the rule of law in Honduras.

For more information contact


Odín Guillén Leiva
Partner, Honduras
E: [email protected]


Iván Flores Hercules
Senior associate, Honduras
E: [email protected]


Pedro Canales
Junior associate, Honduras
E: [email protected]

Return to Disputes Yearbook 2024 contents.

South Korea’s take on international mediation: The next steps going forward

Yulchon LLC’s insight on the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board’s international mediation rules

Among its many endeavours in arduously promoting its many capabilities and qualifications in becoming the next hub for international dispute resolution in North-East Asia, as of 1 January 2024, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) enacted and enforced its own International Mediation Rules (KCAB Rules or the Rules) with the help of Yulchon’s international dispute resolution team members, namely Mr. Yun Jae Baek, Ms. Hyunah Park and Ms. Seyoung Choe. Continue reading “South Korea’s take on international mediation: The next steps going forward”

Navigating dispute resolution: Exploring expert determination mechanisms – Polish perspective

Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak on the increasing importance of dispute adjudication boards

In recent years, court proceedings in Poland have been taking increasingly longer. The natural answer to this is arbitration, but unfortunately, in business reality even arbitration turns out to be too long for the parties. Probably for this reason we observe seeking for dispute avoidance by incorporating different kinds of dispute-resolving mechanisms into contracts. Does it have a chance of working? Continue reading “Navigating dispute resolution: Exploring expert determination mechanisms – Polish perspective”

Riddle of applicable application fee in enforcing foreign judgments

Gün + Partners on the need to clarify the issue of application fees

Under Turkish law, the rules governing the collection of trial fees are regulated by the Law of Fees No. 492 (Law no. 492) and the applicable fees are under Tariff 1 of the Law no. 492. Article 4 of Law no. 492 also explicitly refers to Tariff 1 in terms of the fees applicable in the actions for enforcement of foreign judgments stating that the applicable fee will be determined according to the value, type and nature of the verdict. Continue reading “Riddle of applicable application fee in enforcing foreign judgments”

Debate winners – which disputes teams are best at making their case to the Legal 500?

Disputes is one of the broadest areas of work covered by the Legal 500; while commercial litigation accounts for over half of all of our disputes rankings, a diverse range of specialisms also fall under the disputes umbrella, from professional discipline and commodities to debt recovery and costs. Continue reading “Debate winners – which disputes teams are best at making their case to the Legal 500?”

Disputes Yearbook 2024 – Editor’s Letter

Welcome to the latest edition of the Disputes Yearbook from the Legal 500 and Legal Business; a special edition marking ten years of our annual guide to all things contentious, and a must-read for every self-respecting litigator.

This supplement brings together analysis of the key issues facing disputes lawyers, interviews with senior figures in the market, and an in-depth round-up of some of the biggest cases around. Continue reading “Disputes Yearbook 2024 – Editor’s Letter”

Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit

I am the third generation in my family to have taken up law, following in the footsteps of my grandfather and father. My father was a partner at one of the top law firms in Mumbai and some of my best memories are of sitting in his office during school summer holidays, listening to him advising clients and watching with awe as they would listen. In my eyes no-one was smarter than my father, who clearly had the attention of every client. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Sherina Petit”

Disputes perspectives: Adrian Chopin

When I was nine years old, an elderly relative told me I should consider being a lawyer because I was an argumentative brat. On that flimsy basis I studied law with German law. For my first year, I hated the subject – everything had come easily to me at school but this new thing required a lot of effort. I nearly gave up. At some point I had one of those moments that still makes me wince, but that nevertheless shaped my life. I was sitting on the floor of my room alone, pre-loading on vodka and listening to Pink Floyd’s Time when I had a moment of white panic that I was going to achieve nothing with my life. I ended up learning that the surest way to start to enjoy something is to get good at it, which is usually the reward of a tonne of hard work. I ended up loving my law degree. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Adrian Chopin”

Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC

I didn’t really decide to be a lawyer, the law chose me. I went to a wedding and sat next to a very nice man. He turned out to be a partner in a law firm and we talked career options all night. He gave me his business card and said to call him. I did, and was invited to meet some people. Entirely unbeknownst to me, it was a trainee selection day. I had no idea what I was doing, but I spent a day taking part in various team and individual exercises. At the end of the day the senior partner handed me a brown envelope. I asked what it was and he said, ‘a training contract’. I had to phone a friend to ask what that was. I hadn’t done a day of study in the law, but they paid for me to go to law school. I found my calling and the rest is history. Thank you, Miles. Continue reading “Disputes perspectives: Kate Davies KC”

Holding court – cases of the year

If any trend is set to define the London disputes market in 2024, it is the continued rise of group litigation. A vast array of mass claims are winding their way through the courts, spurred on by an increased willingness to adapt to the challenges of case management, heightened awareness of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues on the parts of corporates and the general public, the maturing of the claimant Bar, and the development of the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) regime – including the rise of the first opt-out class actions.

The comprehensive failure of ClientEarth’s derivative claim against Shell has not slowed activity in the environmental space. In addition to the upcoming decision in the major Municipio de Mariana & Ors v BHP Group, a number of other group actions are brewing, with Leigh Day among the firms leading the charge. The firm is bringing a claim on behalf of more than 11,000 claimants from Nigeria’s Ogale and Bille communities, alleging that oil spills from Shell pipelines have caused long-term contamination of claimants’ land and water. Judgment is awaited in a petition to further expand the claim to address questions about the right to a clean environment. Continue reading “Holding court – cases of the year”