Beyond New York and London: the must-have locations for the global elite

The term ‘global elite’ conjures up images of a group of cosmopolitan, international businesses, drawn from all of the world’s major financial centres.

The reality, however, is much more Anglocentric, and while the question of who qualifies as global elite is up for debate, it is undeniable that the world’s most financially successful law firms are those headquartered in the US or London.

In recent years, geographic priorities have shifted; the magic circle have doubled down on their US ambitions, while historically conservative Wall Street firms are waking up to the importance of a significant London presence.

But beyond the New York–London nexus, which locations are essential for firms aspiring to global elite status? And where do the world’s largest firms still have gaps to fill?


Hong Kong

There is only one location outside the US and UK where all of the world’s top 10 firms have offices – Hong Kong. While many firms have reassessed their presence in Asia in recent years, the former British colony remains essential for global law firms.

While there have been some closures in recent years, including Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner last year and Dechert in 2024, the global top 10 – Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, DLA, Skadden, A&O Shearman, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Ropes & Gray, Baker McKenzie and White & Case – all still have bases there.

Those 10 firms have an average of 60 lawyers based in HK, with Bakers being the largest at around 130, ahead of Latham on 83.


Beijing

While Hong Kong’s status as a gateway to China remains strong, Beijing has become more of a question mark in recent years, with a raft of US firms pulling out amid concerns over data privacy in China.

Despite this, nine of the global top 10 still have a base in the Chinese capital, with the only exception being Ropes & Gray.

These offices tend to be small, with most firms having fewer than 10 lawyers. The principal exception is Bakers, which in 2015 became the first firm to set up a joint operation partnership with a Chinese firm, and now has around 30 lawyers in the city.


Paris

In Europe, Paris boasts the strongest representation among global law firms, hosting nine of the top 10 and more than 1,000 lawyers collectively.

Most of the top 10 have had Paris offices for decades, with White & Case the oldest, having established a base in the French capital – its first international location – back in 1926.

More recent entrants include Kirkland, which opened in 2019, and Ropes, which filled a Paris-shaped gap in its office network last year with the hire of a three-partner Clifford Chance team.

The only firm in the top 10 that does not have a base in Paris is Sidley, which operates from the continent via offices in Brussels, Munich and Geneva.


Brussels

As the de facto capital of the European Union, Brussels is home to nine of the top 10 global firms, with Ropes again the exception.

Brussels’ status as the heart of EU competition law makes it particularly attractive for firms with global corporate ambitions, including firms that otherwise do not have a large global footprint, such as Slaughter and May, Travers Smith and Macfarlanes.

The global top 10 average around 50 lawyers in the city, with Bakers and DLA both having close to 100, while easy links to London mean many competition lawyers split their time between the two cities.


Singapore

Another major Asian financial centre, Singapore, is home to nine of the global top 10 – the notable exception being Kirkland & Ellis.

While the rest of the global top 10 have been established in Singapore for many years – with an average of around 30 lawyers in the Asian city-state – Kirkland is an outlier in that it has never opened in Singapore, instead servicing Southeast Asian clients from Hong Kong.

And as pressure on profits becomes ever more intense, where firms absolutely need to have boots on the ground – and where they can afford not to – will only come under greater scrutiny.

The markets where the world’s 10 biggest law firms have offices

    • Hong Kong: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Beijing: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Brussels: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Paris: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Singapore: Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Frankfurt: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Munich: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Sidley, Bakers, A&O Shearman
    • Tokyo: Latham, DLA, Skadden, Sidley, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Riyadh: Kirkland, Latham, DLA, Gibson Dunn, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Seoul: Latham, DLA, Skadden, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Abu Dhabi: DLA, Skadden, Gibson Dunn, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Dubai: Latham, DLA, Gibson Dunn, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Milan: Latham, DLA, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Shanghai: Kirkland, DLA, Ropes, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Duesseldorf: Latham, DLA, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Madrid: Latham, DLA, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman
    • Sydney: DLA, Sidley, Bakers, White & Case, A&O Shearman

Trading Places: Cleary hires A&O Shearman capital markets duo as Freshfields tech M&A pair move to Covington

San Francisco, California

In New York, Cleary Gottlieb has hired equity capital markets co-head Ilir Mujalovic and capital markets partner Harald Halbhuber from A&O Shearman. 

Mujalovic, who was global co-head of US capital markets and global ECM, was a lifer at the firm, joining legacy Shearman & Sterling as an associate in 2003, and returning to the firm in 2014 after three and a half years at Bank of America Merill Lynch.

He is recognised by Legal 500 as a leading partner for capital markets: equity offerings, and joins Cleary as head of the firm’s equity capital markets practice.

Meanwhile, Halbhuber joined then-Shearman as a partner from Davis Polk in 2011.

‘The continued growth of our corporate practice in the US is a priority for us,’ said Jeff Karpf, Cleary managing partner since January. ‘Our world-class capital markets team has been at the forefront of precedent-setting transactions for decades, and adding Ilir and Harald’s deep knowledge and relationships further expands our ability to handle complex transactions for our clients.’

The departures are the latest in a string of exits for A&O Shearman: as of last October, more than 130 partners had left the firm since the merger between Shearman and legacy Allen & Overy went live in May 2024.

Covington & Burling has hired two leading tech M&A partners from Freshfields, including the UK firm’s US tech and life sciences transactions lead.

John Fisher, who served as head of Freshfields’ US technology and life sciences M&A group, joins Covington in Palo Alto, while Tomas Rua, who was a partner in the same group, joins in New York.

The pair joined the firm in 2020, with Fisher joining as part of a four-partner hire from Sidley Austin that launched Freshfields’ Silicon Valley office. Rua joined as an associate from Cleary, and made partner in 2024.

‘We partnered with John and Tomas as co-counsel on some of the most complicated and highly regulated tech M&A deals last year,’ said Covington corporate practice chair and M&A practice co-chair Catherin Dargan.

She continued: ‘They have established strong reputations for advising technology clients on some of the industry’s most intricate and strategically important transactions and will expand the work we already do with leading technology companies.’

Leading secondaries partner Robert Emerson has joined Latham & Watkins’ investment funds practice in New York.

Emerson joins Latham after three years at Goodwin, where he developed expertise on a range of liquidity solutions for private equity and investment funds, and led fundraises for domestic and foreign clients which scaled to over $15bn.

Simpson Thacher has added a partner each to its energy and infrastructure and capital markets practices in New York.

John Anselmi, who joins Simpson’s banking and credit practice, focuses his practice on financing project and infra transactions through banking finance, private credit and bonds, for sectors from liquified natural gas to data centres in regions across the globe.

Prior to the move he spent 23 years at Sullivan & Cromwell, most recently as a special counsel. He joins Simpson as a partner.

Keith Harden joins the firm’s capital markets practice, and brings expertise in structured finance and securitization, especially in real estate. Prior to the move, he was at Dechert for five years, becoming a counsel this January.

Cadwalader has hired two partners in its financial restructuring practice across New York and London.

Shai Schmidt, who is based in New York, joins from boutique Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, where he spent five years, and Jakeob Brown moves across after nine years at Akin, where he was a counsel.

Orrick has hired Agatha Kluk as a partner in New York. Kluk, who advises founders, board members and investors across the tech ecosystem, joins from Perkins Coie, which acquired her boutique Kluk Farber Law in 2022.

Fried Frank has strengthened its M&A and private equity practices in its New York and London offices.

Nathan Pusey, who is based in the US, previously spent eight years at Morgan Lewis, while Rhett McPhie was a partner in Kirkland’s London office for five years.

McPhie’s practice is focused on secondaries and private capital sponsors and funds, and Pusey bring experience in asset management M&A.

DLA Piper has launched a new cross-border capital solutions practice with three partner hires from Akin.

Ranes Ramanathan and Alex Cushman join in New York, with Daniel Wayte joining in the London office. The team will focus on providing counsel on bespoke financing strategies across debt, equity and hybrid investment situations.

Ramanathan will lead the group and brings experience in restructurings and complex situations after co-leading Akin’s private credit and special situations practice.

In Washington DC, Steptoe has hired life sciences and antitrust litigator Jonathan Janow from US national firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, where he spent almost seven years.

Janow brings experience in high-stakes disputes in federal and state courts, with matters ranging from trade secrets to class actions.

Clifford Chance has also hired in antitrust in DC, with Stacy Frazier joining the firm after three years as the deputy general counsel at UnitedHealth group. Frazier bring in-house experience from Fortune 100 companies, where she managed a broad portfolio of antitrust issues from transaction to litigation matters.

O’Melveny has also grown its antitrust team with the hire of two litigators, who join the firm as partners.

Diana Aguilar joins the firm from the US Department of Justice, where she was a trial attorney in the Antitrust Division, and Lauren Weinstein joins from litigation boutique MoloLamken, where she made partner in 2020.

They join the firm’s San Francisco and Washington DC offices, respectively.

Finally, Philadelphia-headquartered firm Blank Rome has hired corporate and M&A partners Robert Zinn and Megan Wotherspoon into its Pittsburgh office from K&L Gates.

Zinn co-led K&L Gates’ corporate practice for 15 years and helped found its manufacturing and fintech industry groups, he is also a Legal 500 Hall of Famr lawyer for mid-market M&A.

Meanwhile, Wotherspoon was a firm lifer, at the firm for nearly two decades and making partner there in 2015.

[email protected]

HSBC’s Stephanie Hamon on how AI is becoming a must for panel firms

HSBC is making AI expertise part of its new selection criteria for law firms to win a spot on its coveted panel, in a bid to futureproof its external firm engagement model.

The bank’s 18-strong panel is expected to run for another three years. During this time, firms will need to demonstrate that they are embedding AI in their work and show how they are partnering with the bank, or risk losing their spot.

HSBC’s outside counsel engagement process is being led by Stephanie Hamon, who joined the bank as global head of legal external engagement in September last year, and has been tasked with examining and revising the entire lifecycle of the bank’s legal advisory outsourcing strategy.

Hamon told Legal Business that her priorities are to optimise and scale commercial management strategy and futureproof its engagement model.

She said: ‘How do we start anticipating and co-creating what the ecosystem is going to look like with AI enablement? Our view is that the landscape is going to change quite rapidly – and when I say rapidly, it’s not five or 10 years, it’s probably three.’

Over the next three years, an unofficial ‘natural selection’ process will take place, with firms required to demonstrate how they are embedding AI into their workflows.

‘We will see which of the vendors are really engaging with us on our transformation journey and engaging with the AI enablement. At the point in time where we’re considering refreshing our panel or renewing contracts, some firms will naturally have run themselves out of the competition,’ she said.

Hamon is clear that this cannot just be talk: the bank expects the firms to come up with real solutions that will save costs and introduce it to new and innovative technologies and AI-enabled solutions.

‘There’s been a lot of press around what firms say they’re doing – but we are yet to see a lot of that translating into reality,’ she said. ‘One way to get started is that we’re going to soon include AI-related questions in all RFPs. The idea is that it will be a potentially differentiating factor for firms to win the work.’

She continued: ‘The second is that it’s a way for us to say ‘tell us where you think AI could provide improvement or provide value in that transaction? Which tool would you be using? What is the use case? What would the benefits be?’ The firm that comes up with a compelling reply will win the work, because we want to try that with them. Quite quickly, it will become a selection criteria.’

Hamon and the bank’s chief legal officer Bob Hoyt worked together at Barclays between 2015-2019, during which time the bank completed its final global panel review. The duo’s approach was considered ambitious then, as it is now, with concepts such as effective fee arrangements over the traditional hourly billing model being introduced and continuing on now at HSBC.

Speaking with Legal Business at the end of last year, Hoyt referenced the bank’s ambition to bill 80% of its legal work on a fee arrangement removed from the hourly billing model. Hamon said that the bank is achieving this goal so far.

‘We are going to need our partners to embed more into our workflows and our ways of working.’

‘When it comes to capability, we will always need the deep expertise that law firms have, to an extent. But this is where AI can help in-house teams move up the value curve, because until recently, what made a good lawyer was the time they spent learning the black letter of the law. Now, with advancements in technology, we’ll be able to capture a lot more of that and access that knowledge.’

She added: ‘You could have a couple of scenarios whereby, for instance, from the get-go, you create a hybrid team, where in-house and external work together to design the answer and the solution. So our view is that we need to start co-creating the solution with our law firms.’

While the bank has not disclosed the firms on its panel, Linklaters has advised on a number of significant matters for HSBC in recent years, including the launch of its blockchain-based payment capability in Singapore last year, and the sale of its banking operations in Argentina in 2024.

Other firms that have recently advised the bank include Freshfields, Ashurst and Dentons, while earlier this year, Clifford Chance advised on the privatisation of Hang Seng Bank, its Hong Kong-listed subsidiary.

[email protected]

King & Spalding posts near-50% London revenue hike as PEP passes $7m mark

Tom Sprange QC

King & Spalding increased its London revenues by almost 50% during 2025, as global revenue and profit per equity partner also rose by double digits.

The US firm’s London office, which is led by disputes partner Tom Sprange KC (pictured), posted a 48% increase in City revenues to reach $148.2m – one year after passing the $100m mark for the first time.

Commenting on the results, Sprange KC said: ‘2025 proved to be a breakthrough year for the London office, reaping the benefits of a selection of strategic investments. We moved to our new offices in 8 Bishopsgate in May 2024 and have been expanding with top talent across our transactional, disputes and regulatory teams, at both senior and junior levels.’

‘This expansion, coupled with an emphasis on organic growth through promotions and our extensive trainee programme, laid the foundation for a stellar year,’ he added.

Since opening in London in 2003, the office has grown to 49 partners and 99 fee earners in total.

2025 saw a number of significant hires in London, including transactional tax specialist Russell Warren, who joined from Travers Smith, where he led the tax practice, and financial services litigation partner Jonathan Swil, who joined from A&O Shearman.

Those hires came on the back of a major team hire in 2024 which saw a 12-partner finance and restructuring group join from Cadwalader, led by London fund finance head Samantha Hutchinson.

The London hike comes as global revenue also climbed to $2.68bn, a 13% increase on 2024’s $2.37bn.

PEP growth was even steeper, climbing by 22% to $7.26m, a figure which puts the firm among the top 10 most profitable Am Law 100 firms.

Equity partner count dipped by 9% to 179, while its non-equity partner count rose by 11.1% to 360.

In total, the firm added 39 partners in 2025 across 12 offices worldwide. Major moves included the launch of a new office in Sydney led by Darren Gardner, the head of the firm’s global human capital and compliance team.

Why in-house counsel must lead ‘a fundamental shift’ to survive the digital transition

Dr Ahmed ElHadidi, former VP legal at Saudi National Bank, on how in-house counsel can stay ahead of the regulatory and technological curve of digitalisation, following the recent UNCITRAL Colloquium on Digital Trade and Finance at the United Nations Headquarters in New York

Regulation of digital assets continues to vary across jurisdictions. How can in-house counsel manage cross-border inconsistencies while still driving business growth? 

To manage jurisdictional inconsistencies while driving business growth, in-house counsel must transfer from a reactive compliance mindset to a proactive ‘legal architect role’, establishing a stable legal floor through a multi-layered analytical approach. This strategy involves conducting a meticulous conflict of laws analysis — categorising the asset’s nature, deal structure, and the corporate nexus of all parties — to choose a governing law that guarantees brilliant outcomes regardless of an asset’s technical location.

By aligning the governing law with the administrative platform’s jurisdiction, and adopting a ‘highest common denominator’ standard based on international benchmarks, in-house counsel can ensure that digital assets are born global, reducing the cost and time of entering new markets. 

In-house counsel can drive growth by utilising the power of private law to create a private legal ecosystem through robust master agreements that defines control and transfer even where local statutes are lagging. This approach is reinforced by implementing legal interoperability to anchor operations in high-certainty hubs, while serving emerging markets. Ultimately, by providing assets with a portable legal identity and engaging in proactive regulatory shaping, in-house counsel transform legal uncertainty into a managed commercial variable. The business can then pivot to new technologies and jurisdictions without requiring a total legal overhaul. 

And how can in-house counsel balance potential commercial pressure to adopt digital assets quickly with the regulatory uncertainty that still remains within the sector? 

To balance commercial pressure with regulatory uncertainty, in-house counsel should transfer from a ‘yes/no’ approach to a risk-tiered integration strategy.  By allowing low-risk pilot programmes in a controlled legal environment, the company gains experience while capping liability. This proactive stance demonstrates that legal is not a barrier to innovation, but a navigator seeking the most viable paths to execution. 

In-house counsel can further mitigate uncertainty by employing dynamic, adaptive clauses that provide pre-planned pivots during regulatory shifts and by adhering to the principle of functional equivalence. By ensuring digital transactions mirror the functions of traditional, well-regulated assets, the entity benefits from a safety net of established case law – even in the absence of specific digital statutes.  

In addition, infrastructure providers already licensed in modernised jurisdictions shift the regulatory burden to a specialised, regulated infrastructure provider, which reduces the direct risk for the company. ‎ 

The colloquium took a forward-thinking stance: with digital trade and secured transactions law evolving rapidly, what practical steps can in-house legal teams take to stay ahead of legislative developments? 

In-house counsel must establish a specialised legal tech watch unit of experts, with deep academic and practical experience, to monitor the rapid evolution of digital law. This unit should implement a dynamic legislation matrix to categorise global jurisdictions as ‘adopters’, ‘observers’, or ‘restrictive’, while bridging the tech-legal gap by assisting throughout the product development lifecycle. By collaborating during the coding phase, rather than reviewing a finished product, counsel can ensure that control and traceability features are built into smart contracts from the outset, guaranteeing they meet the highest standards for functional equivalence. 

What are some of the key challenges in-house counsel may face when operating in different technological environments? 

A primary challenge arises when digital assets move between different systems, such as from a ‘token-based’ model to a ‘registry-based’ system. This move can break the legal definition of a transfer and control unless contracts are strictly ‘technology neutral’. This fragmentation further complicates cross-border due diligence and the verification of ‘chain of title’, creating a risk of inadvertent non-compliance with anti-money laundering. 

Traditional legal remedies, like rescission or restitution, become physically difficult to enforce without backdoors built directly into the platform’s architecture that can bypass automated immutability. This complexity extends to litigation, where proving ‘causation’ or liability in an automated environment is more difficult than in paper-based trade. Finally, in-house counsel must mitigate the risk of lost or stolen private keys by drafting custody agreements that clearly separate ‘technical access’ from ‘legal ownership’. This ensures that the loss of a digital key does not legally equate to the permanent loss of the asset from the company’s balance sheet. 

As digital platforms increasingly support modern secured transactions, are there any opportunities or risks that in-house counsel should prioritise? 

The shift toward digital platforms for secured transactions presents a double-edged sword. In-house counsel can leverage this to drive significant corporate growth. By prioritising real-time updates to security interests, in-house counsel can reduce valuation gaps and increase borrowing capacity. Programmed automated enforcement also helps in avoiding multi-year litigation costs. And these platforms dissolve geographical barriers, allowing local assets to be verified and pledged to international lenders in global financial hubs. 

To manage the accompanying risks, in-house counsel must implement legal guardrails – starting with strict de-materialisation protocols to eliminate the dual-entry risk of conflicting physical and digital records. It is equally critical to prioritise ‘step-in rights’ and data portability clauses to protect the enforceability of security interests in the event of platform insolvency. To prevent cyber-risks, legal teams must also conduct thorough technical due diligence: the legal definition of ‘control’ must be sufficiently resilient to prevent unauthorised actors from un-perfecting or transferring collateral through a breach. 

Are there emerging asset classes or transaction structures discussed at the colloquium of which in-house counsel should be aware? 

In-house counsel must navigate through the emerging classes like digital negotiable instruments, verified carbon credits and programmable smart escrows. 

Digital platforms raise other legal questions – how can in-house counsel ensure that they are managing concerns such as data privacy and cybersecurity? 

In the evolving digital asset landscape, in-house counsel must view data privacy and cybersecurity as core legal liabilities and high-value assets. This begins with a ‘privacy by design’ approach: in-house counsel must ensure that privacy-enhancing technologies are integrated into the system architecture from day one, strictly limiting data collection to the minimum required for transactions. To secure these assets, legal teams must mandate multi-factor authentication for any individual with the authority to move or control digital assets. This mitigates the risk of unauthorised transfers that could lead to irreversible financial and legal loss. 

Beyond preventative measures, in-house counsel must be on the board of a multidisciplinary response team, with legal and IT experts, to manage the inevitable risks of the digital environment – including cyberattacks. Managing third-party risk is essential: in-house counsel should utilise specialised platform due diligence questionnaires to audit vendor security and negotiate contracts that include immediate notification duties, ensuring that any breach at the vendor level is reported within hours to allow a swift and coordinated legal and IT response. 

What are the main points that in-house counsel can take away from the colloquium? 

In-house counsel must lead a fundamental shift to survive the digital transition: from traditional possession-based legal frameworks to a control-based model. This requires a meticulous review of security agreements to replace outdated concepts, like physical delivery, with a definition of control centered on the ability to exclude others and execute transfers. In-housebcounsel must treat platform terms & conditions as private codes of law, scrutinising how these digital ecosystems handle critical issues, such as insolvency and dispute resolution between users, to ensure business continuity and legal certainty. 

To drive growth in this hybrid era, where assets like e-bills of lading exist in both paper and digital forms, in-house counsel must implement ‘single token protocols’ to prevent the risk of an asset being pledged twice. This strategy must be supported by guaranteeing interoperability, ensuring that digital assets remain portable across different platforms and recognised across various jurisdictions. Finally, while embracing automated enforcement, such as the ability to lock assets upon default, counsel must mandate a human-in-the-loop override to maintain the legal authority to pause automation whenever a legitimate dispute arises. ‎ 

Traitors and Big Brother producers recruit top firms for major media merger

Gibson Dunn, Macfarlanes, and Kirkland & Ellis have all taken roles as Traitors producer All3Media combines with European powerhouse Banijay Entertainment to form the world’s largest independent TV production group.

The deal will see All3Media, owned by RedBird IMI, a joint venture backed by private equity firm RedBird Capital Partners and Abu Dhabi-based IMI media group, unite with Banijay Entertainment to form a media giant.

Gibson Dunn is advisingAll3Media and its owner RedBird IMI, with a cross-border team led by New York-based private equity co-chair Richard Birns and partner Stefan dePozsgay, and includes London partner Will Summers, Paris partner Bertrand Delaunay, and Los Angeles-based Steve Tsoneff.

New York and Washington DC-based tax practice group co-chair Eric Sloan and London partner James Chandler are advising on tax aspects, and London-based European leveraged and acquisition finance head David Irvine and partner Kavita Davis are advising on financing.

Meanwhile, Paris-headquartered Banijay Group was advised by Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier, Macfarlanes, and BDGS Associés, with Kirkland advising on financing.

Macfarlanes’ team included M&A partner Harry Coghill, head of commercial Will Hedges, corporate partner Rosie Duckworth, and competition partner Malcolm Walton, all in London, as well as Brussels-based antitrust partner Foad Hoseinian.

Kirkland fielded a London-based team comprised of debt finance partners Evgeny Zborovsky and Philipp Engel, and capital markets partners Cedric Van den Borren and William Taylor.

The combined group – which will be called Banijay – will be jointly owned by Banijay Group and Redbird IMI, with each holding a 50% stake. The combined earnings will be consolidated into the wider Banijay Group, listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange.

Banijay Entertainment is home to hits such as MasterChef, Survivor, Pointless and Big Brother, with All3Media’s stable including The Traitors, Call the Midwife and Fleabag.

The group will encompass over 170 creative labels distributing content in nearly 25 countries.

Banijay Group CEO Francois Riahi commented: ‘This transaction represents a decisive step in Banijay Group’s strategy to reinforce its leading position in global entertainment.’

‘In all our businesses, we are leading consolidation, and this transaction is another demonstration of this in content production,’ he added.

The deal marks another major media combination after Paramount’s $108bn hostile bid to acquire Warner Bros Discovery, which is moving ahead after Netflix dropped its earlier $83bn bid last week.

Subject to regulatory approvals, the deal is set to close by autumn 2026.

[email protected]

‘Unprecedented success’ – Hogan Lovells breaks $3bn revenue barrier as Cadwalader vote nears

Hogan Lovells has posted a double-digit revenue hike for 2025 to reach almost $3.3bn, as the firm nears a partner vote on its planned merger with Cadwalader.

The 11% growth in revenue to $3.285bn comes against a near 15% hike in PEP to $3.52m, with the results coming after December’s news that the firm has agreed a tie-up with Cadwalader, New York’s oldest law firm.

The results mean the proposed union will create a firm with revenues just shy of $4bn, as Cadwalader’s turnover for 2025 stood at $616.8m – down slightly on last year’s figure of $638m.

Hogan Lovells attributed its record results during 2025 to an increase in demand from clients across highly regulated industries around the world.

The Americas were a particularly strong driver of growth, bringing in $1.6bn in revenue, meaning the region’s overall contribution to firmwide turnover edged up one percentage point to 50%. EMEA contributed 46% of revenue, on par with last year, while APAC equated to 4% – marginally down on last year’s figure of 5%. UK billings climbed 10% to reach $635.4m.

Billings in the US were up nearly 12%, with CEO Miguel Zaldivar telling Legal Business that New York brought in roughly $250m in fee income, with the firm’s performance in the US more generally aided by its strong governmental relations and regulatory experience.

By practice, transactional practices made up 42% of firmwide revenue, with – highlights including advising the Government of Ukraine on a landmark mineral rights agreement with the US, and acting for Oxfor Ionics on its $1.1bn sale to IonQ. Regulatory and IP matters contributed 30%, while disputes brought in 28%.

The overall growth at the firm took revenue per lawyer to $1.21m – 10% up on last year.

Zaldivar said: ‘The US had unprecedented success – every metric was incredible and it helped push up our results. In New York we had our second straight year of crossing $250m after the Stroock deal [the acquisition of a 30-strong team from Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in late 2023], and that shows that my goal of building New York into a real engine of the firm is achievable.’

‘I’m delighted with our performance globally – we’ve seen six years of a very consistent implementation of our strategy that everyone understands.

‘We shine at the intersection of business and government and we do it globally. We’ve got very solid financial foundations, but we remain humble. To win the race we have to stay the course.’

Zaldivar told LB that partners were on track to vote on the firm’s proposed union with Cadwalader in April or May, with the expectation that the merger will go live in July.

Partners from both firms are expected to retain their existing remuneration systems for two years, before moving to a single combined system.

Commenting on the ongoing discussions, Zaldivar said: ‘The chemistry between us is there. Some of these mergers are imposed from the top down, but I don’t want that. I want to have people informed, excited and to understand how well it’s all aligned with what I told the board when I was elected in 2019.

‘Only when partners feel they’ve been fully informed and briefed will we contemplate the vote, but we’re all done with due diligence and we’ve decided how we’re going to run the firm, so it should be April or maybe May. We’re still targeting July to go live.’

In addition to pursuing its merger, the firm is also pushing ahead with investment in new technology and AI, investing around 5% of its annual revenue in tech and digital innovation, including in its legal technology company, ELTEMATE.

For more, see Hogan Lovells Cadwalader: the data behind the biggest ever law firm merger

‘We will get through this’ – partners across the Middle East on business amid escalating conflict

After US and Israeli attacks on Iran this weekend prompted a wave of counter-strikes targeting the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and other Gulf states, law firms with staff in the region have been on high alert.

‘It has obviously been very difficult for all of us who are here,’ said CMS Middle East corporate head Graham Conlon, who is based in Abu Dhabi. ‘These are difficult, stressful times.’

The conflict in the Middle East escalated over the weekend, with targeted attacks killing the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and taking out much of the country’s military capabilities.

In retaliation, Iran launched counter-strikes on allies of Israel and the US in the Middle East, including the UAE, where many international law firms are based.

The majority of Iranian missiles and bomb-carrying drones were intercepted by UAE air defences, however Dubai International Airport and Fairmont the Palm were hit.

With safety concerns paramount, some international businesses in the region have been pulling their staff out of the country, while others are telling employees to work from home to avoid travelling into business centres.

Despite frightening scenes, law firm partners remain confident in the region’s resilience – while also striking a note of realism.

One partner at an international law firm in the UAE said: ‘The principle of the UAE being an entirely safe haven has been scrapped – but this is a one-off event. In the medium to short term, we’re more concerned. But no one’s ever made a lot of money betting against Dubai.’

‘The region always finds a way to respond to every crisis. The government is proactive about rising to challenges – it’s a credit to them,’ the partner concluded.

‘The principle of the UAE being an entirely safe haven has been scrapped’

One London M&A partner handling Middle East matters characterised the client response to recent developments as ‘resilient’.

‘Those who were considering deals are still pursuing them. There is sufficient momentum in boardrooms and investment committees and a confidence that deals will continue,’ he added. ‘The message from clients is business as usual.’

While international law firms are prevalent across the region, the volatility of the Middle East is a reality that those who are based there are well aware of – as one partner based in a global firm’s UAE office put it: ‘The region is not new to conflict.’

The partner added that the initial shock is already subsiding. ‘Out on the streets, the levels of traffic are starting to come back up, and there’s more people around,’ they noted. ‘I would describe it as a COVID-type scenario – work is continuing, and we will see how the next few weeks play out.’

CMS’s Conlon, who previously worked as managing partner for CMS’s Kyiv office at the outset of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, said: ‘We will get through this. There’s a reason why firms have been investing in the Middle East, and that should carry on,’ he added.

‘Clients have been understanding of the circumstances, and for the most part we have been able to achieve both the objectives of upholding health and safety and delivering for our clients,’ he concluded.

White & Case, which has Middle East offices across Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Doha, Riyadh and Oman, is one of a number of major firms to have told staff to work from home.

A firm spokesperson commented: The safety and well-being of our people is our highest priority. We have instructed our people to work from home, following the guidance of local authorities to shelter in place. We have engaged our security protocols and are monitoring the situation in real time to ensure that our teams and our clients have the full firm’s support.’ 

A number of firms have been keen to stress that their offices remain open and fully operational, including Dentons, which confirmed that its UAE team is working remotely ‘in line with prevailing guidance’.

In a statement, Greenberg Traurig chair Richard Rosenbaum said the firm was ‘deeply committed to the region – we think of ourselves as a family and we are in it for the long term,’ adding that while the firm’s offices were remaining open, staff had been encouraged to work remotely as needed to ensure their safety.

Macfarlanes to open New York base led by former managing partner

Macfarlanes is set to open a representative office in New York this year, in a rare overseas push for the London-headquartered firm.

The office will open on 1 April, and will be led by Julian Howard, who served as managing partner from 2010 to 2022, and is currently a senior advisor.

It will open at 667 Madison Avenue, at a location that is already fitted out, and will initially house a small number of staff in the single digits, made up of members of the firm’s investor intelligence team.

There are no plans for the lawyers at the office to practice US law.

Howard has already relocated to the US, and has prior experience handling international operations for Macfarlanes, including as resident partner in Tokyo from 1992 to 1997.

‘The US leads the way globally as a source of institutional capital for private capital funds, for private capital AUM, for private wealth, and as a legal market’, said Damien Crossley, who will become senior partner at the firm this April when Sebastian Prichard Jones’ second term ends.

‘Opening a representative office in New York is consistent with our independent model and our strategic focus on the private capital and private wealth markets.’

Macfarlanes stressed in its statement that the move should not be taken as a move away from the strategy that has long seen it avoid international expansion.

‘The New York office will bring the firm closer to the US private capital and private wealth markets. It does not change the firm’s international model. The office will not practise US law,’ the firm said in a statement. ‘Macfarlanes will continue to practise only English and EU law from London and Brussels.’

Macfarlanes has only one other office outside of the UK, in Brussels, where it opened in 2017 with a trio of hires from King & Wood Mallesons.

The firm previously had an outpost in Johannesburg, but closed it in 2016 after its only partner Scott Brodsky left to join a client.

[email protected]

A safe haven in an unsafe world – how Ireland’s legal market is thriving amid global instability

When reflecting on the Irish market in 2025, the overwhelming consensus among law firm leaders is that the year was chaotic, but ultimately fruitful. 

As Arthur Cox managing partner Geoff Moore sums up: ‘Notwithstanding all of the craziness geopolitically, business continues to be really good, and we’ve had one of our best years yet’. 

This is a sentiment shared by William Fry managing partner Stephen Keogh. ‘The Irish economy and the Irish legal market have continued to be very strong,’ he says. ‘Comparative to instability seen elsewhere, it is a very easy place to do business’. 

Leaders at Ireland’s ‘Big Six’ – A&L Goodbody, Arthur Cox, Matheson, McCann Fitzgerald, Mason Hayes & Curran and William Fry – all agree that 2025 was a strong year for the domestic market, with international firms that have joined the Dublin fray in recent years also commenting on the draw of the Irish market for international opportunities. 

‘Ireland has emerged as a core part of many firms’ growth strategies’, says Pamela O’Neill (pictured), who took over as managing partner of Eversheds Sutherland’s Dublin office last September.

‘This reflects its strategic importance within the European legal landscape, its proximity to Europe and its long history and connection with both US law firms and the many US-headquartered companies in Ireland’. 

Adapting to change

While 2025 ended with firms feeling satisfied with how the year had gone, yet more geopolitical turmoil – driven in large part by US President Donald Trump’s threats of sweeping global tariffs – meant things started off on a less than ideal note. 

‘Ultimately, it was a tale of four months and eight months for us’, says A&L Goodbody managing partner David Widger. ‘Ireland is a very open economy and so we can be influenced by fluctuating external dynamics, and the impact of tariffs caused some uncertainty and slowdown in some practice groups early in the year, but the market recovered strongly and the rest of the year was very strong – and this has continued into 2026′.

Following Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ announcement last April, the EU-US trade deal agreed in July set out a 15% tariff on all EU goods, down from the previously threatened 30%.

And while the US Supreme Court recently struck down the tariffs as unconstitutional, the uncertainty they sparked presented an unexpected bump in the road for Irish business.

Moore (pictured) continues: ‘We definitely saw the classic phrase of ‘when the US sneezes, the world catches a cold’ being exacerbated last year. Liberation Day and the application of tariffs spooked an awful lot of people, but actually the world just got on with things again.

‘Lots of uncertainty is just the new norm – the world’s got to continue to spin, and the world’s got to continue to do business,’ he sums up. 

Mason Hayes & Curran managing partner William Carmody and Matheson managing partner Darren Maher both also acknowledge the ever-present nature of uncertainty and volatility in the post-pandemic market. 

‘This volatility makes long-term planning increasingly complex, and Irish firms must demonstrate agility in advising on cross-border matters as both Ireland and Europe continue to adapt,’ Maher says.

With regards to specific sectors driving business activity, tech is unsurprisingly cited as a priority for firms, while regulatory work is also making up a large part of the flow of work for many practices. 

‘The strongest areas for firms continue to be those where regulation, investment and risk intersect,’ comments Carmody, while Widger adds that government investment in infrastructure has also created notable workstreams for firms. 

At William Fry, banking and finance co-head Padraic Kinsella highlights the impact of Ireland’s housing shortage on workstreams, with real estate finance mandates creating a lot of work in recent years. 

Others cite the pharma, cyber and food and beverage sectors as notably active, with clients benefiting from Ireland’s role as a bridge between the UK, EU and US markets. 

‘Ireland tends to have a huge amount of cross-border activity, both inbound and outbound, and we’re seeing more and more international private equity funds looking at Ireland,’ comments William Darmody, who heads up the Irish corporate team at UK firm Browne Jacobson, which launched in Dublin in July 2022. ‘There’s been a lot of UK funds especially looking to Ireland, so having a joined-up UK and Ireland offering has been very helpful’.

Market movement

One of the biggest stories of the year was the mooted combination of William Fry with Eversheds Sutherland’s Ireland arm, news of which first emerged in December 2024. 

Initial discussions explored the possibility of William Fry absorbing the entirety of Eversheds Sutherland’s near-50 partner operation in Ireland, but the talks ultimately faltered, with a full combination proving unachievable.  

By September, the outcome for William Fry was the acquisition of a twelve-lawyer, four-partner corporate team, while Eversheds retained 26 partners for a new, fully financially integrated Irish practice across its Dublin and Belfast bases.  

Other Eversheds Sutherland lawyers splintered off, finding new homes at firms including Beauchamps, Fieldfisher, Addleshaw Goddard, Dentons and Byrne Wallace Shields, with former Eversheds Sutherland Ireland managing partner Alan Connell now a senior partner in the tax department at Philip Lee. 

‘The more instability we see elsewhere in the world only serves to highlight how stable Ireland is’

Despite the upheaval, Eversheds remains fully focused on the Irish market, and is bullish on the benefits of its newly integrated offering. ‘Since the integration, our Ireland team has grown by over 10%’, states O’Neill, who previously led the disputes team before succeeding Connell as managing partner of the new Dublin team. ‘We are in growth mode in Dublin and Belfast, and hungry and ambitious for continued success’. 

Within the domestic Irish market, there is some sense of missed opportunity for William Fry, given a full combination could have created one of the largest firms in Dublin. Other sources characterise the fallout from the deal as ‘difficult’ and ‘unfortunate’, pointing in particular to the impact on more junior staff and trainees, some of whom were left adrift. 

However, this was by no means the only combination on the table in 2025. In January, domestic duo Byrne Wallace and LK Shields finalised a tie-up to create Byrne Wallace Shields, which with more than 200 solicitors is now snapping at the heels of the Big Six.

Later in the year, Fieldfisher announced its expansion into the Cork market through a merger with local firm Regan Wall, building on its existing presence in Dublin, and 2026 kicked off with Philip Lee also adding a Cork presence through a combination with BHK Solicitors 

‘It’s very possible we’ll continue to see smaller mid-market mergers into the future’, comments Widger, ‘not necessarily to become challengers to the bigger firms, but in order to be more efficient and economic, and ensure a better offering for a certain segment of the market’. 

Keogh (pictured) adds: ‘The cost of doing business as a law firm isn’t getting any cheaper, and it is becoming increasingly difficult for those smaller firms to absorb the costs of technology and employment, so that does often cause people to look at where they might find synergies with others’. 

The influx of international firms seen in the early 2020s has also now begun to cool, with the likes of Browne Jacobson and Addleshaw Goddard – which also moved into Dublin in 2022 via the acquisition of Eugene F Collins – now settled in the market following periods of expansion and recruitment. 

Money talks

One challenge all Irish firms face is the battle for junior talent, with the lure of London salaries and attractive in-house opportunities among the temptations for lawyers who have cut their teeth at domestic firms. 

As Moore states: ‘The draw of London is still a challenge, and anyone who tells you it’s not isn’t being truthful – the rates on offer can be quite compelling for somebody at the start of their career’. 

Keogh adds: ‘In the last few years, London firms have been very keen to hire young Irish solicitors at any level of experience, from newly qualified up. We do now have a sense that this might be starting to ease off at the newly qualified level, with the firms operating out of London more anxious to focus on those with a few more years’ experience under their belt’. 

The proportion of lawyers working in-house has also continued to creep upward, with 23% of practising lawyers in Ireland now holding in-house positions, up from 2,600 to more than 2,800, according to the most recently released figures.

‘It’s fair to say that the Irish market has, in the last few years, had more and more opportunities for those in private practice to move in-house’, comments Widger.  

However, Irish firms argue they have plenty to offer for those looking for a more balanced career. ‘You have to try and offer something different’, states Jeanne Kelly, one of the founding partners of Browne Jacobson’s Ireland practice and head of the firm’s EU data, privacy and cybersecurity practice. ‘You have to offer a decent place to work, but arguably just as important, you have to offer interesting work, and there’s plenty of that to go around’. 

Maher continues, ‘Maintaining the right work environment is critical – focusing on work/life balance and employee wellbeing to retain talent by creating conditions where lawyers feel supported, valued, respected and genuinely motivated to perform at their highest level. In a competitive market, firms must balance demanding client expectations with sustainable practices that attract and retain exceptional people’. 

Technology and teams

Joining geopolitics, consolidation and talent retention at the top of the agenda is, of course, AI. With Legora, Harvey and Microsoft Copilot now mainstays among many major law firms, the use of AI is moving into newer and more creative spaces. 

‘While some of the leading firms in the market had already adopted automation products, the focus has turned to generative AI products, especially at the higher end of the market’, comments Keogh. ‘That being said, firms are aware of the issues around confidentiality and other potential pitfalls, including the quality of the work generated, so everyone is at their own stage on the AI journey’. 

That sense of caution is echoed by Carmody (pictured), who adds, ‘Technology matters, but it doesn’t replace judgement. The firms that struggle in this space are those that try to do everything at once or treat technology as a shortcut rather than a support for expertise’. 

Expectations around AI usage are also increasing on the client side, with Ciarán Markey, disputes partner and one of the founders of Browne Jacobson’s Dublin office, commenting that ‘sophisticated clients have come to expect it as part of the provided service’.

Moore agrees: ‘Clients are looking at costs and budgets, and efficiencies that service providers might be able to provide through the use of technology. They’re looking for those efficiencies to be passed on’. 

As to what 2026 will hold in store, partners are prepared for more of the new norm – uncertainty. 

‘Geopolitical risk is now increasingly factored into business planning, and businesses are operating under the assumption that conditions can, and will, change’, comments Carmody. 

Such pragmatism only serves to underline the prevailing view among Ireland’s law firm leaders – that the market offers a safe haven in an unsafe world.

‘At a more macro level, Ireland and its economy will, if anything, become even more attractive to global players’, asserts Keogh. ‘The more instability we see elsewhere in the world only serves to highlight how stable Ireland is’. 

DLA Piper and Proskauer lead on BrewDog’s sale to US cannabis and drinks manufacturer

DLA Piper is acting for administrators of long-beleaguered craft beer brewer BrewDog on the sale of some of its UK and Irish assets to US cannabis and drinks company Tilray Brands for £33m, with Tilray represented by Proskauer.

Earlier today (2 March), Clare Kennedy, Ian Partridge and Ben Browne of distressed business advisory AlixPartners were appointed joint administrators to the brewer, with Tilray Brands then agreeing a rescue deal for some of the business.

Tilray is set to acquire BrewDog’s brand, UK brewing and distribution operations, IP and ’11 strategic brewpubs in the United Kingdom and Ireland,’ according to a statement from Tilray.

BrewDog’s 38 remaining bars across England and Scotland will close with immediate effect, leading to 484 redundancies.

AlixPartners is being advised by a team from DLA Piper led by UK head of restructuring Rob Russell in Manchester and restructuring partner Sarah Letson, who leads the firm’s Scotland restructuring practice from its Edinburgh office.

DLA is  a long-time adviser to the embattled brewing company, acting for it on the 2017 acquisition of a 22.3% stake by private equity firm TSG Consumer Partners, in a deal that promised the PE house an 18% compound return on its £213m investment in the event of an exit.

DLA also acted for the brewer in its joint venture with Budweiser in 2023, a move that saw it expand into China under the Budweiser brand.

For Tilray Brands, investment bank Jefferies acted as financial adviser, with Proskauer acting as external legal counsel.

AlixPartners said in a statement: ‘No offer was made at any stage of the sales process, from any prospective bidder, which would have preserved BrewDog in its entirety.’

[email protected]

Revolving Doors: City hires at Goodwin, Ropes as Willkie brings in former CC antitrust head

Willkie Farr & Gallagher has hired Clifford Chance’s former UK competition head as a partner in London.

Greg Olsen will join after stepping down as an ordinary member of the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Before that, he spent 17 years at Clifford Chance, where he served as the firm’s UK competition leader until 2024. He previously held the same role at Jones Day, where he spent six years before moving to Clifford Chance.

Olsen’s practice focuses on UK and EU competition matters, including mergers, joint ventures, market investigations, cartels and antitrust.

Willkie’s chairman Matthew Feldman commented: ‘[Olsen’s] arrival is the latest demonstration of our continued investment in our global antitrust & competition practice. His varied experience, including representing some of the world’s leading corporate, private equity, and financial institutions, will benefit our clients as they continue to navigate a changing regulatory landscape.’

Ropes & Gray has also looked to Clifford Chance for a recent London hire, bringing in private equity specialist Lavinia Ralli in London.

Ralli joins as a partner following a year as counsel at Clifford Chance. Prior to this she served as global head of investment legal at Partners Group, a private equity firm and long-standing client of Ropes & Gray.

Her arrival follows a series of senior transactional hires in Europe this year. These include private equity and M&A partners Paul Dali, the former GC of key client EQT, and Alessandro Capogrosso, who joined from PedersoliGattai in Milan.

In late January, the firm also added funds partner Edouard Chapellier and tax partner Jonathan Abensour, alongside eight associates, from Linklaters in Paris.

Also in the City, Cohen & Gresser has hired private equity partner Olga Ponomarenko from Latham & Watkins.

Ponomarenko advises clients including PE sponsors, sovereign wealth funds, and financial institutions on a wide range of M&A transactions. She previously spent 18 years at Latham, making partner in 2018, and she joins alongside associate Irina Bratishkina, from Cleary.

Elsewhere, Goodwin has hired City venture and growth equity funds partner Ed Kingsbury.

He joins from CMS, where he spent seven years as a funds partner, after three years as a senior associate in Dechert’s financial services group.

In Australia, White & Case has hired private capital and M&A partner Alex Elser from King & Wood Mallesons in Sydney, where she served seven years on its private equity team.

Elser’s practice spans all aspects of transactional work for private equity sponsors, including Blackstone, KKR, Apollo and EQT.

In Europe, Simmons & Simmons has added two private equity partners to its bench.

In Frankfurt, Hans Peter Leube joins following a two-year stint at Morgan Lewis. Prior to this he served just under ten years at Bird & Bird, where he was co-head of the firm-wide private equity group.

In Amsterdam, the firm has hired Vincent Dogan, who joins from A&O Shearman where he was senior associate.

Back in the UK, Eversheds Sutherland has appointed a new general counsel.

Andrew Cheung joins from Pinsent Masons, where he spent three years as GC. Prior to this he served 13 years as general counsel and then partner at Dentons in Dubai, leading the firm’s Middle East compliance and regulatory investigations practice and the Dubai commercial disputes and arbitration practice between 2020 and 2023.

Also making operational moves was Kennedys, as the insurance specialist firm has hired Milan Devani as its global chief information officer.

Devani joins from Baker McKenzie, where he was most recently the director of global infrastructure. He spent more than 26 years at the firm, first joining as a European support specialist in 1998 and returning in 2000 after ten months at then-Nabarro Nathanson.

Womble Bond Dickinson has hired real estate lawyer Andrew Yates as head of living capital in London. He joins from DLA Piper where he spent three years as coordinator of international living capital.

Greenberg Traurig made two hires into its London office recently, bringing in both real estate partner Simon Elliott from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer and media and entertainment partner Robert Turner from Bird & Bird, who is recognised as a Legal 500 next-generation partner for sport.

Kingsley Napley has hired tax partner Kelly Grieg, who joins from Blick Rothenberg, an accounting, tax and advisory firm where she was a private client partner servicing high net-worth individuals.

She is joined by Abbie West-Kelsey as a tax manager, who also, until August 2025, worked at Blick Rothernberg, as an assistant tax manager.

Freeths has hired seven lawyers into its employment and pensions team, including one partner in London and one in Bristol, as well as one managing associate and four associates.

Melanie Stancliffe joins following six years at Cripps Pemberton Greenish as an employment partner in London, while James Dean joins as pensions partner and head of the pensions team in Bristol. Prior to this, he served eight at Simmons & Simmons.

Squire Patton Boggs has hired Gemma Hanley, who was previously head of Pensions at Eversheds Sutherland in Leeds, as well as Matthew Harris, who joined the intellectual property and technology practice in Birmingham from Gowling WLG.

Finally, Brodies has hired Levy & McRae partner Neil Hay. A Legal 500 leading partner for crime in Scotland, Hay moves to Brodies alongside a legal director and a solicitor.

[email protected] 

Sullivan & Cromwell continues London finance build with another hire from Weil

Sullivan & Cromwell has hired another partner from Weil into its growing City office, marking its fourth lateral hire from Weil in just six months.

Banking and finance partner Jenny Choi, who made partner at Weil last January, will join S&C as its ninth new partner hire in London since last September.

S&C co-chairs Robert Giuffra and Scott Miller said: ‘Jenny is an exceptional finance and private equity lawyer, and we’re delighted to welcome her to S&C as a partner,’

They added: ‘Her extensive experience in the private capital markets complements the strength of our London team and reinforces our commitment to delivering market-leading advice to clients in this space.’

Choi’s move marks the latest step in an aggressive City buildout that the historically conservative New York firm has pursued since it boosted its London office last autumn with the headline hires of former Weil London head Mike Francies and Kirkland & Ellis restructuring partner Kon Asimacopoulos.

Speaking with LB around the time of the moves, S&C’s Miller expressed the firm’s desire to grow in the UK, saying: ‘I think London should be 50% bigger than it is.

Since then, the firm has continued to hire from Weil, bringing over finance partners Chris McLaughlin and Alastair McVeigh earlier this year.

Other notable hires include private equity partner Aprajita Dhundia and tax partner Ian Ferreira, who both joined from Kirkland in December, and derivatives and structured finance specialist Patrick Clancy, a former partner at legacy Shearman & Sterling who joined S&C in January after more than a year as a consultant for Peerpoint, A&O Shearman’s flexible resourcing business.

More recently, S&C also hired a pair of practice heads from Paul Hastings, bringing over European restructuring practice chair Will Needham and high-yield practice chair Patrick Bright.

Asimacopoulos and co-managing partner John Horsfield-Bradbury said of Choi’s addition: ‘Jenny is an incredible addition to our top-tier acquisition finance and sponsor focused practice, building on the recent high profile additions of Chris McLaughlin, Alastair McVeigh and Patrick Bright.’

They added: ‘Together with our continued investment in acquisition finance, private equity, specialty lending, and restructuring, her arrival enhances our London team’s ability to advise on the market’s most complex financing transactions.’

For its part, Weil has also made additions to its European offering, as it hired Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher’s co-managing partner in Frankfurt, Kamyar Abrar.

In London last year, the firm also made notable hires including A&O Shearman funds partner Phil Baynes and Ropes & Gray PE secondaries partner Simon Saitowitz.

[email protected]

‘Growth is the magic word’ – how the UK’s competition watchdog is shaping the deal landscape

2025 was the year of the megadeal, with total global M&A values reaching $4.8trn – the second-strongest year on record – as a wave of blockbuster transactions helped to keep market confidence buoyant.

Competition authorities around the world played their part in this, with merger enforcement easing in the US and the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) blocking no deals last year, according to a report by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.

Hogan Lovells partner Angus Coulter (pictured), the former head of the firm’s London competition team, describes the CMA’s current stance as ‘radically different’ to its historic approach.

‘You can get a green light for a deal in two or three weeks, which is great for our clients,’ he says.

Another senior competition partner at a global firm agrees, saying that ‘growth is the magic word’ for the CMA right now.

The organisation has faced scrutiny in recent years after it blocked Microsoft’s $69bn acquisition of US video game company Activision Blizzard, a decision which was later reversed amid criticism that the move risked discouraging investment in the UK.

The episode, described as ’embarrassing for the CMA’ by one senior partner, drew the authority into the spotlight and prompted a shift towards a more business-positive focus.

And further change is on the horizon, with the organisation currently consulting on reforming its panel system for Phase 2 investigations – the final stage of its merger review process before a decision is reached.

Proposed changes could see the panel of independent experts who review mergers replaced with a committee of individuals appointed by the board – a suggestion which has proved controversial among partners amid concerns that decisions could be exposed to lobbying efforts and government influence.

Other proposed reforms include extending the first phase of investigations to allow parties more time to resolve competition concerns; shortening the three-year market review process; and increasing its capacity to investigate algorithms as it continues to grapple with big tech.

So with megadeals still front and centre, including the upcoming merger of Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount, how will the CMA position itself for the future?

‘Political influence is much more overt than it was before’

The mood music from CMA CEO Sarah Cardell – who stepped into her role in late 2022 – has been ‘to focus on the deals that relate to the UK only and stop being the global policeman that goes after global deals,’ according to one partner.

Linklaters competition partner Jonathan Ford concurs, saying that in response to criticism, the CMA has aimed to demonstrate that it could ‘move fast and be more proportionate, particularly in response to their interventions in global transactions.’

Ford’s view is that this has been a positive move, particularly for clients. ‘The CMA appearing to evolve its approach over the last couple of years has actually made more clients ask questions as to whether there are deals that could be done, that may have been difficult in the past, and whether there are more opportunities in the UK.’

But not all partners are so positive, with some citing undue influence from government. One competition partner at an international firm says the CMA has become ‘an unpredictable organisation to deal with for clients.’

‘Political influence is much more overt than it was before,’ according to the partner. ‘These changes are making businesses and partners uneasy, because they are not based on competition law – the CMA is being told what to do by the government.’

Checks and balances

Alongside suggestions of government interference, the proposed reforms to the panel system are also providing cause for concern.

Linklaters’ Ford says the panel system serves as an important check on CMA leadership.

‘The concern with placing more responsibility in CMA leadership and the organisation without the independent panel is that you may lose that fresh pair of eyes. It is hoped that the new committee structure will take shape in a manner which helps mitigate these concerns,’ he notes.

He continues: ‘The independent panel was one of the few checks and balances we could point to in the UK, and losing it with no access to file, and a high hurdle of judicial review, makes it one of the regimes with the fewest checks and balances internationally against its peer groups.’

Coulter also has questions about the proposed reforms. ‘I don’t think that the decisions being taken at Phase 2 were wrong, or that they weren’t being taken efficiently.’

‘There is a nervousness amongst lawyers – what exactly will it be replaced with? Will it be a rigorous, independent decision-maker? Because we don’t know what the answer is yet.’

The CMA’s consultation on reforms is expected to close at the end of March this year.

The long view: which LB100 firms have performed best over the last ten years?

Seven LB100 firms have more than tripled their revenues over the last decade, according to an analysis of ten years of financial data, with just two firms tripling partner profits over the same period.

Total revenue for the LB100 broke through the £40bn mark last year – almost double the £20.6bn recorded in 2014-15 – fuelled by a decade of mergers, sustained international expansion and steady performance gains among the UK’s top law firms.

So which firms have seen the highest growth rates for turnover, profits and headcount over that period? And what are the factors behind that performance?

Profit per equity partner

One common thread links the top three performers for profit per equity partner growth over the past decade – transatlantic mergers.

Hogan Lovells is the top firm on this metric, with PEP increasing by 225% from 2015 to 2025, rising from £739,000 to £2.4m.

In 2015, the firm was five years into the merger of the UK’s Lovells with US firm Hogan & Hartson, and in the years since has consistently increased its profitability, including a particularly steep hike between 2019-20 and 2021-22, when PEP jumped by more than 50% from £1.18m to £1.81m.

Norton Rose Fulbright is second for PEP growth over the decade, with a 222% increase from £394,000 in 2015 to £1.3m in 2025.

That decade saw Norton Rose Fulbright combine with US firm Chadbourne & Parke in 2017, just four years after the transatlantic combination of Norton Rose with Houston’s Fulbright & Jaworski.

In third is transatlantic pioneer DLA Piper, whose transformative three-way US merger took place much further back, in 2005. While it has not quite tripled PEP over the decade, it is very close – up 195% to just above £2.6m.

Hogan Lovells PEP, 2015-25

 

Turnover

The firms that have seen the sharpest revenue growth over past decade unsurprisingly include a number that have gone through major mergers since 2015.

Womble Bond Dickinson tops the table for ten-year growth, with turnover increasing by 352% from 2015 to 2025.

This hike is primarily due to the 2017 merger of UK firm Bond Dickinson with US firm Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, a deal which saw it go from a £105m UK firm to a £358.3m transatlantic player.

While the firm has continued to grow, it has done so at a more modest rate, with a 30% increase in revenue from 2020 to 2025, now sitting at £484.1m.

Other firms to have undertaken major mergers over the past decade include Gowling WLG, another strong ten-year performer, with its 227% growth largely down to the 2016 combination of UK firm Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co and Canada’s Gowlings.

Similarly, Eversheds Sutherland has notched a 235% revenue increase over ten years, with the 2017 merger of UK firm Eversheds and US firm Sutherland Asbill & Brennan adding $300m to legacy Eversheds’ £400m revenues. The firm now sits in 10th place in the LB100, with total global revenues of £1.275bn.

Notably, East Anglian firm Birketts is the second-fastest grower for revenues over the past decade, with a 246% increase over the last ten years from £34.9m to £120.7m placing just outside the top 50 in the 2025 table.

The firm has achieved this with consistent strong performance in corporate and real estate, and a steady string of expansions that saw the firm launch in London through its 2020 merger with insurance boutique EC3 Legal, expand into the South East through a merger with Kent and London-based Batchelors in 2023, and expand its Bristol hub into a full-service office in 2024.

Meanwhile, other strong-performing UK nationals include TLT, which has increased its revenue by 199% to £187m over the past decade, and Nottingham’s Freeths, which hit £166.8m last year – an increase of 198% since 2015.

Other UK-heritage firms that have grown on the back of sustained international expansion include Kennedys, up 230% to £429m, Osborne Clarke, up 205% to £460.9m, and Addleshaw Goddard, up 186% to £550.9m.

Womble Bond Dickinson turnover, 2015-25

Headcount

Birketts is also the fastest growing firm for headcount over the past 10 years, with an increase of 183% since 2015, followed by Fieldfisher, which has increased its total lawyer headcount by 153% over the last decade.

Fieldfisher, also ranks third for turnover growth, with fee income up 240% from £113m in 2015 to £385m in 2025.

The decade of growth came after the firm adopted a new strategy in 2016, dubbed ‘‘Our Future Refocused’, centred around technology, energy and natural resources, and finance and financial services.

Since then, it has pursued a range of mergers both in the UK and overseas, including with Birmingham’s Hill Hofstetter, Italian firm Studio Associato Servizi Professionali Integrati, and Chinese boutique JS Partners, all in 2016.

The firm expanded across Europe in 2018, launching in Madrid and Barcelona through a merger with Spanish firm JAUSAS, and also opening offices in Frankfurt and Luxembourg, as well as Belfast.

It followed up with a 2019 merger with Irish firm McDowell Purcell, and opened an office in Berlin in 2022 for its ‘Fieldfisher X’ mass litigation and operations arm.

Fieldfisher total lawyer headcount, 2015-25

[email protected]

The LB100’s stars and stragglers: breaking down the numbers

Top US antitrust and white-collar lawyers in the spotlight in latest Legal 500 US Elite rankings

Over 1,300 lawyers are featured in the latest Legal 500 US Elite rankings, including new rankings for antitrust and white-collar in Washington DC and New York.

The latest release includes a total of 1,364 lawyers from 420 unique firms, over half of which have not previously been ranked by Legal 500.

The US Elite recognises the top lawyers at firms outside of the global elite in different markets across the United States, with specific rankings for key practice areas.

Launched in February last year, the US Elite now comprises a wide range of geographic and sector coverage across the United States. The first release highlighted key practices in Washington DC, New York and Chicago. Rankings covering Boston, Miami and Charlotte were released last April, followed by key practices in Philadelphia, Atlanta and Ohio in June, and Texas and the Midwest in October.

Most recently, Legal 500 released its rankings covering the West Coast, Salt Lake City and Detroit last month.

This latest release sees new rankings added for New York, Washington DC, Boston and Philadelphia, as well as additions to existing rankings in each of those cities.

On top of this, the latest release also includes two new regions, ranking key lawyers in the state of Connecticut and the region of New England, which includes lawyers from Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine.

New rankings:

Additions to existing rankings:

Washington DC and New York: antitrust and white-collar crime

Litigation boutique Rule Garza Howley was the top performer for antitrust in the capital, with five lawyers ranked, including two in tier 1.

The DC firm was founded in 2022 by former Paul Weiss antitrust co-chair Rick Rule and Daniel Howley, who was a counsel at Paul Weiss, and co-chair of global competition at Covington & Burling, Deborah Garza.

Also performing well was another boutique firm established by former Paul Weiss partners: Dunn Isaacson Rhee, which was founded last May by litigation department co-chair Karen Dunn and partners Bill Isaacson, Jessica Phillips, and Jeannie Rhee, after Paul Weiss in March became the first law firm to strike a deal with the Trump administration to provide $40m in pro bono work to causes the administration supports.

After less than a year of operation, the firm has been recognised with two tier 1 rankings, as well as an additional ranking in tier 3.

Meanwhile, in the city’s white-collar crime ranking, the New York headquartered MoloLamken and DC boutique Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears both achieved three rankings each, including two each in tier 1.

In New York, New Jersey-founded Lowenstein Sandler was the strongest performer in the white-collar crime ranking, with three lawyers recognised, all in tier 1.

Another high achiever was New York-based full-service firm Meister, Seelig & Fein, which also saw three lawyers ranked, including two in tier 1.

Connecticut and New England

In the Connecticut rankings, the highest performing firm was New Haven-headquartered Wiggin and Dana, which saw 11 of its lawyers recognised across commercial disputes, corporate and M&A, and white-collar crime, with three lawyers in tier 1.

Also making a splash is Stamford-based Finn, Dixon & Herling, which saw seven lawyers recognised across all three of the state’s rankings, five of which were in tier 1.

Meanwhile in the New England rankings, Adler Pollock & Sheehan was the top performer, with a total of ten rankings.

The Providence-headquartered firm, which also has offices in Newport and Manchester, New Hampshire, as well as Boston and New York, saw four of its lawyers ranked in tier 1.

Elsewhere in the region, Portland, Maine-headquartered Pierce Atwood received nine rankings, and both Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green, based in Manchester, and Drummond Woodsum, also based in Portland, achieved eight rankings.

Legal 500 is continuing to build out its US Elite coverage, with rankings covering key markets across the country. Check the US Elite page to learn more.

[email protected]

Top performing firms by ranking (new rankings only)

 

Location Practice Firm Rankings
Connecticut All Wiggin & Dana 11 (2 commercial disputes, 5 corporate and M&A, 4 white-collar)
New England Commercial disputes Adler Pollock & Sheehan 5
Corporate and M&A Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green 5
Real estate Perkins Thompson 4
Washington DC Antitrust Rule Garza Howley 5
Cybersecurity ZwillGen 7
Intellectual property Bookoff McAndrews 4 (3 tier 1)
White-collar crime MoloLamken 3 (2 tier 1)
White-collar crime Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears 3 (2 tier 1)
New York Banking and finance (including restructuring) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young 4
Cybersecurity and data protection BakerHostetler 4
Intellectual property Pryor Cashman 5
Real estate Federman Steifman 4
Real estate Goldfarb & Fleece 4
Real estate Harter, Secrest & Emery 4
Real estate Hirschen Singer & Epstein 4
Real estate Hodgson Russ 4
White-collar crime Lowenstein Sandler 3 (all tier 1)
Philadelphia Banking and finance (including restructuring) Duane Morris 4 (1 tier 1)
Intellectual property Flaster Greenberg 3 (all tier 1)
Real estate Duane Morris 5
White-collar crime Ballard Spahr 4
Boston Banking and finance (including restructuring) Brown Rudnick 5
Intellectual property Choate, Hall & Stewart 6 (1 tier 1)
Life sciences: regulatory Manatt, Phelps & Phillips 4
White-collar crime Nutter, McClennen & Fish 4

Leading lawyers across LA, San Francisco, Seattle and more, unveiled in biggest Legal 500 US Elite rankings yet

‘Shame on them’ – how political views are making GCs think twice about law firms

Political considerations are rising up the agenda for GCs when selecting which external law firms to work with, with concerns over values increasingly impacting relationships with outside counsel.

The Association of Corporate Counsel’s annual Chief Legal Officers Survey, which surveyed more than a thousand chief legal officers and legal executives around the world, found that 13% had changed their approach to evaluating and selecting outside counsel based on political developments in the US.

Of that group, almost half (41%) said that they had added new risk categories to their outside counsel evaluation criteria, including vetting a firm’s political affiliations, public statements or client roster.

More than a third (37%) said they had gone even further and stopped working with specific law firms due to concerns about their political associations, their stances on specific policies and public profile.

Legal Business spoke with a number of GCs to get their thoughts on how these factors are influencing relationships with law firms.

‘It makes me think twice about the loyalty they’d have for us as clients’

One GC did not mince his words, commenting: ‘If the biggest and most powerful law firms in the world are going to let themselves be bullied and not stand up for the rule of law, separation of powers, and, frankly, not stand up for groups of people that aren’t as well equipped to defend themselves, then shame on them.’

‘It also makes me think twice about the loyalty they’d have for us as clients and their staying power in defending those clients who choose to stand up to bullying behaviour. At some point, money and profit can’t be everything.’

One GC at a company with a prominent presence in North America said they were surprised that the proportion of legal heads factoring political considerations into their choice of law firms was not even higher.

The survey did provide evidence of stronger views in other Western economies, with 18% of respondents from European companies saying that they had altered their stance, above the US at 15% and Canada at 14%.

In contrast, just 7% of respondents from Asia, Australia and the Middle East said these factors had changed the way they evaluate law firms.

‘Some suppliers and customers are very, very red, and others are very, very blue’

For some senior in-house lawyers, the response from some law firms to US President Donald Trump’s accusations of ‘illegal DEI discrimination’ has served as a line in the sand.

Many firms opted to cut deals with Trump, offering millions of dollars in pro bono and other legal work in exchange for protection from his threats, although others did opt to challenge the President in court, with some success.

One GC cited the increasingly polarised nature of US politics as a serious issue when doing business in the States – particularly given the legal considerations relating to positive discrimination.

‘In the US, it’s illegal to have positive discrimination against or for any employees based on characteristics other than social mobility. You’ve got to go through your entire stakeholder map and understand how your own organization is viewed, particularly in the US,’ they said.

Referring to the Republican/Democrat divide in the US, the GC elaborated: ‘We have some suppliers and customers who are very, very red, and some who are very, very blue – we have to change our narrative in terms of what our company position is. For certain sectors, it’s really important.’

A number of major companies, including GSK, Boeing and Disney, made headlines at the start of last year for cutting DEI targets and modifying their outside messaging after Trump’s executive orders were issued.

While for some companies, political developments in the US are an unavoidable issue, for others, they are not seen as business critical.

One GC was very clear that the quality of service a firm provides remains the key driver: ‘Politics is not a primary consideration for me. My focus remains on core factors like quality of work, responsiveness, judgement, and the firm’s ability to support the business effectively.’

Another GC reiterated this point: ‘We always evaluate our panel firms based on a lot of different criteria. What’s important to us is ensuring that we’re getting the best advisers with the best technical skills that are well-regarded and well-connected.’

However, the GC acknowledged that when values don’t match, in their experience, there could be problems in the working relationship further down the line, ‘if we don’t have that alignment, then there is the potential for us to be unable to work collegiately.’

‘You can’t go on any device without seeing the former chair of Paul Weiss’

While the fallout from Trump’s executive orders last year appears to have subsided, the revelations in the recent release of the Epstein files – many of which involve lawyers and law firms – have once again given GCs pause for thought on the affiliations or perceived affiliations of the firms they work with.

One GC explained their perspective on the recent headlines with specific reference to Brad Karp, who stood down as chair of Paul Weiss following revelations about his connections to Epstein.

‘You can’t go on any device without seeing the former chair of Paul Weiss,’ they said. ‘If an individual in a law firm that we engage in was directly involved, we would certainly be carefully considering what our relationship with them should be, and the capacity in which we would continue to work with them.’

They continued: ‘The criteria we have for law firm engagements and appointments includes ethical conduct and integrity – we screen all of our law firm relationships through that.’

For more, see:

Line to the top: more GCs than ever now reporting directly to their CEO, research finds

‘It’s always best to avoid death by a thousand cuts’ – what GCs think about the Brad Karp-Epstein firestorm

[email protected]

Paul Hastings London revenue soars 25% as aggressive recruitment drives growth

Paul Hastings’ London revenue soared by 25% in 2025, making the office a standout performer in a year in which the firm’s far-reaching lateral hiring strategy helped drive global revenues up by 20% to a new high of $2.68bn.

The US firm, which has set out ambitious plans to build its presence in London, saw City revenue reach $272.4m for the financial year ending 31 January. The performance means London now contributes more than 10% of the firm’s global turnover.

New York revenues hit $1.1bn and have now doubled over the last three years.

The firm has yet to confirm profit per equity partner, but its profit per unit climbed by 21% to just over $653,000.

Firm chair Frank Lopez said: ‘2025 was a phenomenal year. We’ve been successful in all of our markets and our unit value, which is the most important financial metric for our partners, is up 117% in five years.’

Lopez highlighted London, New York and Texas as particularly strong-performing regions for the firm, with Texas now contributing 6%-7% of firmwide revenue.

By practice, he highlighted transactional practices like finance and M&A, saying: ‘All of our practices did well and 16 of our 17 practices had double-digit growth but, for the first time in five years, our transactional practices particularly drove our results last year. Finance, M&A and capital markets were all a big jump for us last year.’

Commenting on the performance in London, he said: ‘London is an anchor for us. It has been extraordinary. We’ve almost doubled our revenue in two years and our strategy is to build a premier office on the ground there.’

Paul Hastings has made 10 lateral hires in London in just six months, including this week’s hire of Slaughter and May corporate partner Mark Zerdin and last week’s addition of private capital partner Ferish Patel from Cooley.

However, the firm has also seen a number of high-profile partner exits, including high yield and restructuring partners Patrick Bright and Will Needham, who are set to depart for Sullivan & Cromwell, and a three-partner private equity team led by Anu Balasubramanian, which left for Goodwin in December.

Going forward, Lopez said the firm would look to its European offices in France, Germany and Brussels to drive growth over the next five years.

With the lateral hiring forming a key plank of its strategy, Lopez said the firm’s financial performance was crucial to its success in attracting talent: ‘We focus on our financial success because we want to be able to execute on our strategy. Reputational elevation is important.’

For more, see ‘You have to keep swinging’ – Paul Hastings leaders on building London and cracking the global elite

Proskauer London revenue surges 45% as firmwide PEP hits record $5m

Proskauer increased its revenue by nearly 14% over the last year, with London revenue up more than 45%.

Firmwide turnover hit $1.58bn, up from $1.39bn last year, while the firm’s City office leapt forward to $226.8m, up 45% year on year and 77% over the last two years.

Meanwhile, profit per equity partner (PEP) also saw strong performance, with the firm riding a 13% increase to a total of $5.02m, crossing the $5m mark for the first time.

Revenue per lawyer (RPL) was also up, increasing just under 6% to $1.91m, while net income grew by 9.5% to $707.8m.

Proskauer achieved this increase to RPL despite a 7.5% rise in total headcount. However, PEP was boosted by a slight decline in equity partner numbers, which dropped by just under 3% to 141, as non-equity partner headcount was up 10%.

The results build on strong performance last year, when revenue increased by 13% and PEP by nearly 24%, after very slight dips to both turnover and PEP in 2023, as recorded in 2024’s Global 100 table.

The firm expanded in the US last year, including with a new office opening in Charlotte, North Carolina, launched in the autumn with the hire of a four-partner finance team from Cadwalader led by Ron Lovelace, who now leads the office, and was joined this January by litigator Jonathan Watkins.

Meanwhile in London, Proskauer has significantly boosted its finance offering since it hired A&O Shearman banking heavyweight Philip Bowden in summer 2024.

Since then, the firm has made a major play to build out the European arm of its finance offering, including with a successful push into high yield work that saw the London office go from having never advised on a high yield deal to advising on more than ten in 2025.

The firm has continued to grow in Europe into 2026, including earlier this month with a three-partner PE hire in Paris from Cadwalader’s prospective merger partner Hogan Lovells.

[email protected]

Paul Hastings hires London M&A partner from Slaughter and May

Paul Hastings has added a second corporate partner within a week as the firm seeks to build out its London M&A offering. Mark Zerdin is joining the firm from Slaughter and May, where he co-led the firm’s sports practice and led the Latin American practice.

Zerdin, who spent 23 years at the elite UK firm, brings experience advising sports teams, corporates and private equity firms on public takeovers, private acquisitions and disposals, PE investment, and joint ventures.

During his time at Slaughters, Zerdin’s clients included Liverpool Football Club, TWG Motorsports and General Motors, Ladbrokes, and investors and potential investors in a range of Premier League and Championship clubs.

He was also on the team that advised the Premier League on a range of matters relating to the Associated Party Transaction rules, with a dispute with Manchester City settling last September.

The hire marks the tenth into Paul Hastings’ London office in the last six months, including most recently PE partner Ferish Patel, who joined from Cooley last week.

Earlier this month, Paul Hastings also hired funds lawyer David Richardson from Simpson Thacher, in a move that saw Richardson make partner as the firm built on the arrival of fund finance partner Jennifer Passange, who joined from Haynes Boone last year.

However, the firm has also seen at least as many departures over the same period, including the exit to Goodwin last December of a three-partner PE team led by Legal 500 mid-market private equity Hall of Famer Anu Balasubramanian.

Last week, Sullivan & Cromwell hired two practice heads from Paul Hastings, bringing over Will Needham, chair of the firm’s European restructuring practice, and Patrick Bright, chair of its high-yield financing practice.

Despite this, the London office has seen significant growth, with revenue growing by 20% year-on-year and 100% over three years.

Commenting on Zerdin’s departure, Slaughter and May said in a statement: ‘We confirm that Mark is retiring from the partnership and we wish him well.’

[email protected]