‘I was asked to stay on as GC after an inspiring year-long secondment’ – Bain Europe GC Will Rosen

Will Rosen – GC (Europe private equity), Bain

Year of qualification: 1994
Weil Gotshal & Manges, 1996-2007
DLA Piper, 2008-11
Ropes & Gray, 2011-22
Bain Capital, 2022-present

What made you decide to make the switch in-house? And how have you found the change?

After a very enjoyable and fulfilling, decade-long career with Ropes & Gray – first as partner and then as London managing partner – and following an inspiring year-long secondment to Bain Capital, I was asked to stay on as general counsel for the firm’s European private equity business. I had worked with Bain for many years at Ropes, so I had a good familiarity with and understanding of its business. During this time and my secondment, I easily connected with the firm’s culture and values, I enjoyed having a wide range of subjects to cover, and I developed strong relationships with the team. While I loved working in private practice, I thought this was a unique opportunity to join a team that identifies complex opportunities to create exceptional outcomes for its companies, employees, and communities.

What has been the biggest difference compared with private practice?

The biggest differences are the operating model and functional approach. For the former, I was one of a large team focused on private equity transactional work. Now, I am part of a smaller team that covers a much broader set of responsibilities from deal transactions across multiple industry verticals to fund raising, portfolio company matters, and regulatory affairs, among other things.

What are the key skills needed for working in-house compared with private practice?

The skills needed for any career in the legal profession are common: a keen sense of curiosity, strong analytical and written skills, concentrated attention to detail, and an ability to remain calm and adaptable to circumstances. However, when working in-house – due to a wider portfolio of responsibilities – a workday can be less predictable. So, time management skills, an ability to prioritise, and understanding the needs of the business are vital.

What has been your in-house career highlight, and why?

My career highlights have been less about business transactions or work-related dealings but more about feeling personally linked to the firm’s values and purpose and connected with the team across the business globally. It is also about working with brilliant colleagues in the legal team and across the platform to deliver for the business and find the right solutions. Today, there is no shortage of highly capable asset managers but one of the things that drew me to Bain Capital is the culture and the firmwide approach to solving business challenges, partnering with people on the journey to create lasting impact.

What tips do you have for building a career in-house in private equity?

What’s important in any career is building enduring, collaborative, trustful relationships and connection with a diverse set of industry and work partners. Also, it is important to spend time to make sure you understand the business and be proactive in anticipating issues and challenges.

Go to the Private Equity Elite contents.

‘I was greeted at the airport by a banker, lawyer, notary and driver’ – Vitruvian Partners GC Chris Bulger

Chris Bulger – GC, Vitruvian Partners

Year of qualification: 2007
Slaughter and May, 2005-14
Goldman Sachs, 2014-18
Vitruvian Partners, 2018-present

Why did you want to become a private equity lawyer?

I have been involved with alternative asset managers since 2005, during the early stages of my training contract with Slaughter and May. I became very interested in funds work and private equity in particular as the industry grew and was increasingly prominent. I then noticed that the larger private equity firms were beginning to hire their first in-house lawyers, and their role seemed to me to combine the elements of private practice I really liked (such as negotiation and structuring) with a broad in-house mandate that wasn’t limited to involvement in only legal matters.

How long have you been working in-house?

I did a secondment at Goldman Sachs in 2008 shortly after qualifying. It was an extraordinary learning experience as the global financial crisis developed. After six more years at Slaughter and May, I then returned to Goldman permanently in 2014 to cover their private equity and private credit business in Europe, along with various fundraisings and firm investments.

What has been the most memorable moment of your in-house career?

A day trip to Boston to sell shares in an IPO stands out. I made the last-minute decision to fly at 8.30am and was on the plane from Heathrow at 11:30am. Having worked the entire flight on organising the logistics and paperwork (being fortunate that the wi-fi worked throughout the flight and using a copy of the Financial Times for my written notes), I was greeted at Boston Logan International Airport by a banker, lawyer, notary and driver. After signing various documents in the arrivals hall, we then made a few stops on the way to hand-deliver the required paperwork to the transfer agent, making it with an hour or so to spare. After a celebratory Sam Adams at the airport I was back home within 24 hours of departing!

Which sectors do you expect to drive activity this year?

I anticipate technology, healthcare and energy as being busy. Closer to home, I also expect to see further activity in financial services, and asset management in particular. I anticipate that traditional asset managers will continue to look to acquire alternative managers, and alternative managers will acquire managers of other products that they don’t currently offer.

Would you recommend a career working in private equity?

Absolutely – the private equity industry has matured considerably during the nearly 20 years I have been working in it. Private equity and other alternative firms are now significantly more regulated, as are their fundraisings and the transactions they undertake. But this actually provides more opportunities for lawyers to enter the industry at an earlier stage in their careers, and more paths they can then take to develop. Working at a private equity firm can also provide more opportunities for lawyers to get involved in other areas (such as HR, operations and tax), than might be the case with other in-house roles. The industry continues to innovate as well, such as on sources of capital for fundraisings and the structure and type of investments.

Go to the Private Equity Elite contents.

‘You are working with some of the sharpest minds on the planet’ – Bregal Investments funds GC Jonathan Pugh-Smith

Jonathan Pugh-Smith – GC, funds, Bregal Investments

Year of qualification: 2010
Berwin Leighton Paisner, 2008-11
International Justice Mission, 2011-12
Berwin Leighton Paisner, 2012-13
Bregal Investments, 2013-present

Why did you want to become a private equity lawyer?

To be honest, I did not specifically set out to become a private equity lawyer. I have always sought out opportunities in my career where I am valued, where I can continue to grow and learn, that are dynamic and where I feel I can make a difference. Across the last ten years of working in private equity these boxes have more often than not been ticked across the board. Continue reading “‘You are working with some of the sharpest minds on the planet’ – Bregal Investments funds GC Jonathan Pugh-Smith”

‘Private equity must be prepared to explain the benefits it brings’ – CD&R’s Simon Tinkler

Simon Tinkler – Senior legal adviser, CD&R

Year of qualification: 1993
Clifford Chance, 1995-2022
CD&R, 2022-present

Why did you want to become a private equity lawyer?

I loved the intersection between the law and the real world. On each transaction you get to understand a new business or sector, and then to think about the many and varied legal issues that impact on it. I also really enjoy the fact it is a real team effort, both internally and externally; as a private equity lawyer you are absolutely core to that team.  Continue reading “‘Private equity must be prepared to explain the benefits it brings’ – CD&R’s Simon Tinkler”

Burges Salmon hails record financial results as revenue and profits soar

Burges Salmon has reported record financial results, with a 27% increase in revenue to £163m, up from last year’s £128.2m.

Profit per equity partner (PEP) surged by 42%, rising from £466,000 to £661,000, marking a significant turnaround from last year’s nearly 10% dip. Meanwhile, net profit climbed 46%, from £34.6m to £50.5m.

‘These results demonstrate the collective strength and dedication of all of our people, during a year that has seen the value of our strategic investments come to fruition’, managing partner Roger Bull said in a statement.

He added: ‘We’ve seen positive growth across the entire firm, stemming from a deep focus on our markets, our people, and, importantly, our clients. Our commitment to understanding and meeting our clients’ needs has been a driving force behind this success.’

The firm credited its performance to its sector specialisms and key practice areas. Its core sector groups – built environment, energy and utilities, financial services, infrastructure, private wealth, public sector, and transport – achieved an average revenue growth of 32%. Leading the charge were the built environment and energy & utilities sectors, which reported impressive growth rates of 40% and 38%, respectively.

A notable highlight of the year was Burges Salmon’s celebration of the five-year anniversary of its Edinburgh office launch in May. Since its opening in 2019, the Edinburgh office has nearly tripled its partner count, growing from three to eight, as part of an 80-strong team. The firm further enhanced its dispute resolution capabilities in the Scottish capital with the hire of Magnus Miller from Davidson Chalmers Stewart in June, marking the first partner in its dispute resolution team in Scotland.

‘Our chosen markets have not only shown resilience but thrived,’ said Bull. ‘We have benefited from these positive market conditions thanks to our targeted approach and sustained investment over the years. Scotland, in particular, stands out as a testament to our growth strategy, where we’re proud to have celebrated our five-year anniversary in Edinburgh with significant organic expansion and the attraction of exceptional talent.’

The firm has also sustained its growth momentum through strategic lateral hires and organic expansion. Since the launch of its 2021-26 strategy, Burges Salmon has appointed 31 new partners and increased its overall headcount by 30%. Among this year’s key appointments is Steven Hull, who joined from Eversheds Sutherland as a partner in the pensions and lifetime savings team. Additionally, the firm made 19 promotions in May, including five new partners: Chris Brown (pensions), Ros Harris (real estate), Tim Williams (tax), Caroline Brown (dispute resolution), and Lydia Cullimore (projects).

Looking forward, Bull concluded: ‘We are excited to build on this momentum and continue to progress the firm’s ambitious strategy for growth.’

[email protected] 

‘Creating value and preventing value destruction are two sides of the same coin’ – Livingbridge GC Jeremy Dennison

Jeremy Dennison – General counsel, Livingbridge

Year of qualification: 2009
Travers Smith, 2007-12
Goodwin Procter, 2012-14
MUSTO, 2014-15
Travers Smith, 2015-18
Livingbridge, 2018-present

Why did you want to become a private equity lawyer?

My first exposure to private equity was during my training contract at Travers Smith, which has one of the leading mid-market private equity practices in the City. I was working with an amazing team of lawyers and loved the buzz of the deal and the elegance of the PE model. I knew early on that this was the area of law I wanted to focus on. Continue reading “‘Creating value and preventing value destruction are two sides of the same coin’ – Livingbridge GC Jeremy Dennison”

From powerlifting to DJing: the City partners finding that elusive work/life balance

The challenge with law, especially in big firms, is that it can be all-consuming, taking everything you have. As an individual, you must maintain some level of control and ensure there’s enough left for yourself.’ 

As Herbert Smith Freehills global energy co-head Lewis McDonald sums up, being a successful lawyer is a demanding business. But now, perhaps more than ever before, there is a growing recognition of the need to avoid over-work and burnout.

Despite the obvious challenges of achieving that goal, more and more lawyers are shunning the workaholic clichés of old and openly acknowledging the importance of carving out personal time to maintain some semblance of balance in the world of Big Law. 

Continue reading “From powerlifting to DJing: the City partners finding that elusive work/life balance”

‘Do not wait until creditors are banging down the door’ – why preparation is key as restructurings pick up

Restructuring partners have been predicting a surge in corporate restructurings and insolvencies for years. But despite Covid, conflict and rising inflation the boom in such work has yet to materialise to any significant level.

Continue reading “‘Do not wait until creditors are banging down the door’ – why preparation is key as restructurings pick up”

Labour and employment: what the new government means for workers’ rights

After 14 years of Conservative rule, the Labour Party swept into power on 4 July 2024, setting the stage for transformative changes in UK employment law. Labour’s Plan to Make Work Pay promises a bold agenda of reforms aimed at boosting worker protection, ensuring fair pay, and modernising workplace practices. These sweeping changes will have significant implications for employers across various sectors. But what do these reforms mean for employers and their in-house lawyers, and how can they stay ahead of the curve?

Continue reading “Labour and employment: what the new government means for workers’ rights”

Retrenchments in Singapore

The first half of 2024 has been marked by mass retrenchment exercises by major companies in the technology and finance sectors worldwide. The same has been observed in Singapore, although the layoffs have occurred in the wholesale trade and electronics manufacturing space as well.

There has also emerged a TikTok trend of Gen Z employees filming and posting videos of them reacting to being laid off over video call. Such videos can sometimes obtain millions of views. This viral TikTok trend demonstrates that an increasing number of younger employees are not afraid of speaking up against what they perceive to be unfair practices in the workplace – and seeking to hold their employers liable by harnessing the effect of social media. Companies who are shown to be unempathetic to employees may struggle to attract top talent in future, and at the very least, may face a period of intense public backlash and scrutiny.

Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchments

So how should employers conduct retrenchments? Unlike some jurisdictions, Singapore does not have any specific laws dealing with retrenchments that impose specific obligations on employers.

Instead, what employers are expected to do in the event of a retrenchment are set out in the ‘Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment’ (Advisory), an advisory issued by the tripartite partners in Singapore comprising Ministry of Manpower, the National Trades Union Congress, and the Singapore National Employers Federation. This tripartism approach is a unique feature of Singapore’s employment landscape. Many of Singapore’s labour policies, guidelines and advisories are formulated through consultation and collaboration amongst the tripartite partners.

Employers need to note that non-compliance with these tripartite advisories frequently trigger investigations and regulatory action by the Ministry of Manpower, who can impose administrative punishments such as curtailing an employer’s work pass privileges. In 2019, a well-known retailer laid off around 50 staff with immediate effect, without complying with the Advisory – the employer provided no prior warning of the retrenchment and employees were offered retrenchment benefits below those stated in the Advisory. The retailer’s mishandling of the retrenchment exercise garnered extensive media coverage and even drew public criticism from the Minister of Manpower who commented that the retailer ‘could have better handled’ the retrenchment. Consequently, many retrenched employees voiced their complaints and frustrations through the media which gave the incident extensive coverage. In addition, the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices also stepped into the matter to engage with the retailer who eventually increased the retrenchment benefits offered to the retrenched employees.

Under the Advisory, employers’ responsibilities in managing retrenchments can be categorised into three main areas:

Pre-retrenchment considerations

As a starting point, retrenchment should be considered only as a measure of last resort. Employers are required to explore job preservation and cost-saving measures before deciding on retrenchment. For example, employers should consider reskilling, training and redeployment opportunities for employees.

Where such options have been exhausted and retrenchment is inevitable, employers must use objective criteria when selecting employees for retrenchment. Objective criteria include the ability, experience, and skills of the employee to support the company’s sustainability, workforce transformation and/or future business needs. Discrimination on grounds such as age, race, gender, religion, marital status, family responsibilities, or disability is strictly prohibited. Additionally, employers are encouraged to maintain a strong Singaporean core and should not have a reduced proportion of local employees after the retrenchment.

Notification to employees, unions, and the government

Employers should notify affected employees of retrenchment in a sensitive and responsible manner. Before notifying individual employees of their retrenchment, employers should communicate early about the company’s efforts to manage business challenges, the circumstances necessitating the retrenchment exercise, the process involved in the retrenchment exercise, and the assistance that will be provided to affected employees.

For unionised companies, employers should notify and consult with the relevant unions early, before affected employees are notified. This collaborative approach ensures that employee interests are represented and considered throughout the process.

Companies with at least 10 employees have a statutory obligation under the Employment Act to notify the Ministry of Manpower on the retrenchment of any employee within five working days after the employee is informed of their retrenchment. Failure to comply constitutes a civil contravention under the Employment Act and administrative penalties may be imposed.

Supporting displaced employees

Employers are strongly encouraged to provide support for employees displaced by retrenchment, including retrenchment benefits, employment facilitation measures and outplacement assistance.

Retrenchment benefits, if stipulated in employment contracts or collective agreements with the unions, must be disbursed accordingly. Where retrenchment benefits are not contractually provided for, employers are still expected to offer retrenchment benefits to employees with two or more years of service. The prevailing norm is to pay a retrenchment benefit varying between two weeks to one month salary per year of service, depending on the financial position of the company and taking into consideration the industry norm. Employees with less than two years of service could be offered an ex gratia payment.

Re-employment support scheme

Looking forward, a new re-employment support scheme is set to be rolled out by the Singapore government by the end of 2024. The scheme aims to provide retrenched employees with temporary financial support, so that they can focus on upgrading their skills to secure a good long-term job. The Minister of Manpower has said that the government has reviewed best practices globally and is close to finalising the scheme parameters.

The importance of fair and responsible retrenchment practices in Singapore cannot be overlooked. Such practices not only ensure compliance with legal frameworks and advisories but also reflect a company’s commitment to ethical standards and social responsibility. By prioritising transparency, fairness, and employee welfare, employers can mitigate the adverse impacts of retrenchments on affected employees, safeguard their own reputation and credibility, and build trust and loyalty among remaining and future employees. In today’s competitive and rapidly evolving business landscape, employers that embrace these principles will be better poised to navigate economic challenges and emerge stronger than before.

‘If it frees up my time to be more strategic and more creative, then that’s great’

Generative AI is set to transform the way in-house lawyers work. Legal 500 London editor Cameron Purse moderated a recent panel discussion in Edinburgh sponsored by Addleshaw Goddard in which Candice Donnelly, director of corporate (legal) at Skyscanner and Colin Telford, senior legal counsel, NatWest, joined Addleshaw partner Ross McKenzie and head of innovation Kerry Westland to share their experiences. Continue reading “‘If it frees up my time to be more strategic and more creative, then that’s great’”

‘There is total support for getting this done’ – funders and litigators react to King’s Speech litigation funding snub

The King’s Speech this July included an ambitious total of 40 bills – but there was no mention of the litigation funding bill that the last government introduced in March.

Now, the government has confirmed that it will not legislate to overturn the effects of the Supreme Court’s July 2023 PACCAR decision, which prohibited litigation funding agreements (LFAs) that allowed funders to recover a percentage of damages, until summer 2025 at the earliest.

Legal Business caught up with those who know the market to explore what this means for the sector.

Continue reading “‘There is total support for getting this done’ – funders and litigators react to King’s Speech litigation funding snub”

Paul Weiss continues to add Kirkland alumni in London as TDR GC Holdsworth joins

Paul Weiss has continued its rapid London expansion with the hire of TDR Capital general counsel David Holdsworth, who is returning to private practice after less than two years at the private equity house

He is set to join as a partner in the US firm’s London private equity group, bringing the firm’s London partner headcount to 27, according to its website.

Continue reading “Paul Weiss continues to add Kirkland alumni in London as TDR GC Holdsworth joins”