Law firms Guest post: Enforcing a patent is an abuse of process, except where it isn’t Legal Business · 21 July 2015 · 5 min read Corporate and M&A Comment Guest blogs Last week the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment (16 July) in Case C-170/13 Huawei Technologies v ZTE on a matter of great concern to the standard-essential patent (SEP) community.Your limit of 1 article in 30 days is up. Please login for full access or subscribe. Corporate users - click here for simple access (no password needed). For more information, please contact [email protected] Related ContentMore in this categoryA-list firms call the tune on Sony’s multibillion-dollar music catalogue acquisitionLaw firmsEliza Winter13 May 2026Ashurst EMEA energy and infrastructure M&A head set to join Vinson’s City baseLaw firmsWill Lewallen11 May 2026Latham and Davis Polk gear up for $2bn Lime IPOLaw firmsWill Lewallen11 May 2026The customer is always right – which firms do clients rate most highly?Law firmsBen Wheway13 Nov 2024Footing the bill – as chargeout rates spiral, will clients put their foot down?Law firmsLegal Business7 Nov 2024High achievers – private equity is changing; meet the elite GCs at the vanguard of the transformationIn-HouseGeorgina Stanley2 Sep 2024Revolving doors: Simpson Thacher, Latham, Sidley lead New Year London movesLaw firmsAnna Huntley9 Jan 2025Five partners vie to succeed Hoyland as Simmons managing partnerLaw firmsTom Cox7 Jan 2025‘Seize every opportunity’ – Paul Hastings partner Reena Gogna on City law, Suits and poetryLaw firmsAnna Huntley7 Jan 2025