Law firms Comment: Ditching lockstep – better too late than never? Alex Novarese · 13 December 2017 · 3 min read Comment Salaries Freshfields ‘Lockstep in its current form has to go. It’s just not working.’ Legal Business, June 2015Your limit of 1 article in 30 days is up. Please login for full access or subscribe. Corporate users - click here for simple access (no password needed). For more information, please contact [email protected] Related ContentMore in this categorySlaughters and Freshfields in line for over £25m in fees from Rotork-ABB dealLaw firmsKate Peacock7 Aug 2026The $400bn AstraZeneca mega-merger: which firms could land the mandate?Law firmsEliza Winter5 Aug 2026‘I absolutely rely on Claude’ – how Anthropic’s lawyers use AI to keep pace with the company’s explosive growthIn-HouseTheresa Hargreaves3 Aug 2026Last Word: Global visionLaw firmsLegal Business4 Nov 2024‘More uncertainty than any other recent election’ – US partners on what the Trump-Harris race means for Big LawLaw firmsAlex Ryan1 Nov 2024Political persuasions – what City partners are hoping for from the next GovernmentLaw firmsAlex Ryan3 Jul 2024‘After Lehman collapsed, salaries still went up’: Magic Circle NQ pay rises as market coolsLaw firmsHolly McKechnie17 May 2023Time for a reality check on salariesLaw firmsNathalie Tidman28 Apr 2022‘US firms have more buying power’ – Allen & Overy tight-lipped as partnership ushers in lockstep reformLaw firmsNathalie Tidman26 Oct 2020