Law firms Comment: Ditching lockstep – better too late than never? Alex Novarese · 13 December 2017 · 3 min read Comment Salaries Freshfields ‘Lockstep in its current form has to go. It’s just not working.’ Legal Business, June 2015Your limit of 1 article in 30 days is up. Please login for full access or subscribe. Corporate users - click here for simple access (no password needed). For more information, please contact [email protected] Related ContentMore in this category‘The centre of gravity for Southeast Asia’ – why PE investment is making Singapore increasingly attractiveLaw firmsKate Peacock8 May 2026A&O Shearman, McDermott, Paul Weiss become latest major firms to cut staffLaw firmsKate Peacock7 May 2026Legal Business Awards 2026: which firms made the shortlist?Law firmsNews Editor7 May 2026Last Word: Global visionLaw firmsLegal Business4 Nov 2024‘More uncertainty than any other recent election’ – US partners on what the Trump-Harris race means for Big LawLaw firmsAlex Ryan1 Nov 2024Political persuasions – what City partners are hoping for from the next GovernmentLaw firmsAlex Ryan3 Jul 2024‘After Lehman collapsed, salaries still went up’: Magic Circle NQ pay rises as market coolsLaw firmsHolly McKechnie17 May 2023Time for a reality check on salariesLaw firmsNathalie Tidman28 Apr 2022‘US firms have more buying power’ – Allen & Overy tight-lipped as partnership ushers in lockstep reformLaw firmsNathalie Tidman26 Oct 2020