Skip to content
Legal Business
  • Home
  • Law firms
    • Full list of law firms
    • Comparative Guides
    • Global100
    • LB100
  • In-House
    • In-House
    • United Kingdom
    • Green Powerlist
    • All Powerlists
  • International
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Europe
    • Africa
    • Middle East
    • APAC
  • Practice areas
    • All
    • Corporate and M&A
    • Disputes
    • Employment
    • Energy and infrastructure
    • Financial services
    • Private capital
    • Real estate and construction
    • Restructuring
    • Tax
    • TMT
    • White-collar
  • Law firm data
  • Legal 500 data
  • Events
    • Legal Business Awards
    • ESG Awards
  • Green Ambassadors
    • United Kingdom 2026Meet the sustainability legal leaders championing the green transition in the United Kingdom.
    • Europe 2025Meet the sustainability legal leaders championing the green transition across Benelux, DACH, France, Iberia, Ireland, and the Nordics.
    • Asia Pacific 2025Meet the sustainability legal leaders championing the green transition across Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore.
    • United States 2025Meet the sustainability legal leaders championing the green transition in the United States.
    • Latin America 2025Meet the sustainability legal leaders championing the green transition across Latin America.
    • Methodology
    • Archive
      • Green Guide Asia Pacific 2025
      • Green Guide Latin America 2025
      • Green Guide United Kingdom 2025
      • Green Guide United States 2025
      • Green Guide EMEA 2024
  • About
  • Newsletter

CAT orders Law Society to pay up to £230,000 costs in abuse of dominance case while first opt-out consumer damages class action fails

CAT orders Law Society to pay up to £230,000 costs in abuse of dominance case while first opt-out consumer damages class action fails
Author Avatar
Legal Business
8 June 2017

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has hit the Law Society with a costs order of up to £230,000 to pay an online training provider after finding it breached competition law in a ruling published this week, while the first CAT opt-out consumer class action was withdrawn. 

Your limit of 1 article in 30 days is up. Please login for full access or subscribe. Corporate users - click here for simple access (no password needed). For more information, please contact [email protected]

Related ContentMore in this category

‘Status quo is not an option’ – leading fin reg lawyers gather to debate future enforcement challenges

‘There’s definitely competition around rates’ – Clifford Chance and Linklaters match Cravath bonuses for US associates

Johannesburg at sunset

‘It was never a marriage made in heaven’- what Norton Rose Fulbright’s exit means for South Africa

Revolving doors: Simpson Thacher, Latham, Sidley lead New Year London moves

Jeremy Hoyland

Five partners vie to succeed Hoyland as Simmons managing partner

‘Seize every opportunity’ – Paul Hastings partner Reena Gogna on City law, Suits and poetry

Former Freshfields senior partner among recipients in New Year Honours List

Kramer Levin’s Paris office joins Morgan Lewis amid HSF merger deal

Royal Mail

Hogan Lovells joins top firms in £3.6bn Royal Mail takeover as UK govt approves bid

© 2025 Legal Business Magazine

Legalease Ltd, 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

T: +44 (0)20 4604 0667 | E: [email protected]

About & Contacts | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Subscriptions