Legal Business

‘It sits squarely in the SFO’s wheelhouse’: criminal investigation launched into Axiom Ince as regulators and ex-employees grapple with aftermath

A criminal investigation has been launched into Axiom Ince, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced last month. Seven individuals have been arrested in connection with the investigation and searches have been carried out across nine sites.

More than 80 SFO investigators, alongside Metropolitan Police officers, went to locations across the South-East of England on the morning of 14 November to search for potential evidence and bring in individuals for questioning.

Legal Business

SFO opens criminal investigation into Axiom Ince

A criminal investigation has been launched into Axiom Ince, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced today (14 November). Seven individuals have been arrested in connection with the investigation and searches have been carried out across nine sites.

More than 80 SFO investigators, alongside Metropolitan Police officers, went to locations across the southeast of England early this morning to search for potential evidence and bring in individuals for questioning.

‘There are a number of significant questions that need to be answered: clients from this law firm are missing many millions of pounds and more than 1,400 of its staff have lost their jobs. The impact on those affected is extremely serious,’ Nick Ephgrave QPM, director of the Serious Fraud Office, said.

‘This morning, we have used our specialist powers to obtain important information that will help us get to the bottom of what happened,’ he added.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) intervened in the firm on 3 October, closing it with immediate effect to protect the interests of clients and former clients of the firm.

Axiom Ince rescued Ince & Co after its second pre-pack administration in April and bought Plexus Legal in July. However, the situation quickly deteriorated with the SRA intervening into the practices of managing partner Pragnesh Modhwadia, for suspected dishonesty, and partners Idnan Liaqat and Shyam Mistry in August.

The firm filed a claim for alleged breach of fiduciary duty against Modhwadia with a High Court judge imposing a freezing order of £64m against him, after he admitted client money had been used to buy both Ince and Plexus, alongside several properties. Modhwadia was unable to account for the money.

SFO investigators are also set to examine how funds passed from Axiom Ince client accounts with Barclays to the State Bank of India to fund these purchases.

At the time of the SRA’s intervention, Axiom Ince employed over 1,400 staff and operated in 14 branches across England and Wales.

The Metropolitan Police referred the case to the SFO due to the complexity of the alleged fraud. Both organisations will continue to work on the investigation.

Holly.McKechnie@legalease.co.uk

Legal Business

Axiom Ince appoints administrators as Law Society questions compensation fund levy

Axiom Ince has filed documents with the High Court to appoint Neil Bennett, Alex Cadwallader and Andrew Poxon of Leonard Curtis as joint administrators. They will be responsible for closing the firm’s business, realising its assets, and reporting to its creditors.

The joint administrators will operate separately from intervening agents Gordons, Shakespeare Martineau and Stephensons, who will continue to deal with the client affairs of Axiom Ince.

The appointment follows the SRA’s intervention into Axiom Ince on 3 October, with the regulator closing the firm’s offices with immediate effect to protect the interests of clients and former clients of the firm.

Axiom Ince rescued Ince & Co after its second pre-pack administration in April and bought Plexus Legal in July. However, the situation quickly deteriorated with the SRA intervening into the practices of managing partner Pragnesh Modhwadia, for suspected dishonesty, and partners Idnan Liaqat and Shyam Mistry in August.

Axiom Ince went on to file a claim for alleged breach of fiduciary duty against Modhwadia. A High Court judge subsequently imposed a freezing order of £64m against Modhwadia, after he admitted client money had been used to buy both Ince and Plexus, alongside several properties. Modhwadia was unable to account for the money. Axiom had bought Ince for just £2.2m, making an initial £1m payment and paying the remaining £1.2m in instalment.

Given the £64m client account deficit and limited financial assets left at Axiom Ince, former clients are expected to apply to the SRA’s discretionary compensation fund to recover their money.

Concern is now mounting about how these costs will be covered. According to the SRA Compensation Fund Annual Report, accumulated funds on 31 October 2021 were only £50.6m. The SRA is considering imposing a one-off levy on the profession to make up the shortfall.

Losses caused by the Axiom Ince fallout are further compounded by the SRA’s closure of the Metamorph Group and Kingly Solicitors earlier this year, leaving the solicitor profession with a potentially large bill to pay.

Yesterday (31 October) The Law Society of England and Wales made a public statement expressing concern over the proposed plans. ‘As the representative body for the solicitor profession, we are of course greatly concerned that our members could be asked to plug a gap of many millions of pounds in the Compensation Fund arising from the collapse of just three law firms, which were set up under atypical business models and with their own clear and inherent risks,’ said its chief executive officer Ian Jeffery.

‘We would expect the solicitor profession to be consulted before any decision is made by the SRA on its approach to these exceptional compensation questions, given that our members would be required to pay for it and it is their collective reputation at stake,’ he added.

While acknowledging the legal remit of the SRA, Jeffery was keen to stress that The Law Society wished to work with the regulator to reach an equitable solution. ‘As a representative body we recognise that regulatory decisions are by law a matter for the SRA, but we have a role to be assured that the SRA complies with its statutory duty and the regulatory principles guiding any regulatory action which must be transparent, accountable, proportionate, consistent and targeted,’ he said.

‘We will work with the SRA and, as appropriate, the Legal Services Board, to ensure that events are fully investigated and that all proper assurance is provided,’ Jeffery concluded.

holly.mckechnie@legalease.co.uk

Legal Business

‘A salutary lesson’: Axiom Ince closed by SRA following months of turmoil

Drawing a long-running saga to its inevitable conclusion, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced on 3 October that it had closed down Axiom Ince with immediate effect following its intervention to protect the interest of clients and former clients of the firm.

Regarding the intervention, the SRA said: ‘We will stop the firm from operating, take possession of all documents and papers held by the firm, and take possession of all money held by the firm (including clients’ money). We are not responsible towards employees or trade creditors of firms that we have intervened in.’