Legal Business

Global 100 Regional View – Emerging Powers

2014 is the first year since 2007 that western jurisdictions were not comprehensively outclassed by emerging markets. But Legal Business finds the siren call of eastern economies is still too hard to resist for most Global 100 firms.

‘Nothing appears to have changed in the way firms move in and out of markets,’ reflects Norton Rose Fulbright chief executive Peter Martyr. ‘When it’s good, the Wall Street firms come in sharp and fast with a big chequebook and withdraw quickly when it’s bad. The global firms, on the other hand, take the pain over a much longer period.’

The dynamic outlined by Martyr emphasises two clear themes from law firms over the last 12 months: continued investment by US law firms into London as a strategic hub and, more widely, a continued hunger by Western law firms to invest in emerging economies.

The determination comes despite many key emerging economies undershooting predictions over the last two years, notably China, India and Brazil, and a relative period of revival in the higher rate but lower growth markets of the US, UK and Europe.

This desire to move east comes despite a growing acknowledgement that a combination of tough competition, tougher regulation and fee sensitivity in Asia is making the much-touted region difficult for law firms to make money in. But if Asia has yet to live up entirely to managing partners’ hopes, Africa has established itself over the last three years as an increasingly tempting territory for law firms seeking new opportunities.

For Clifford Chance (CC) senior partner Malcolm Sweeting, the general economic factors that drive clients and law firms to Africa are compelling. ‘People talk about this being the Asia century. That may be right but I would query whether the latter part is the Africa century. If you look at the 7% growth club, there are more African economies growing than anywhere else in the world. It has tremendous potential as it exports nearly everything it has, including natural resources. If it achieves sustainable economic development, firms will have to work out how to position themselves. We will be looking to position ourselves around major projects.’

Having first launched itself in the region over 30 years ago, CC has since taken steps to augment its presence, including the opening of an office in Morocco in 2012. Since then, many others have followed suit in the last year. Dentons completed a tie-up with local associate firm KapdiTwala in April to establish a presence in Cape Town. It also plans to open an additional branch in Francophone Africa later this year. Five months earlier saw Hogan Lovells combine with South African law firm Routledge Modise, giving the transatlantic practice a Johannesburg arm with 120 lawyers, including 40 corporate partners. The firm reasoned that a physical presence in Africa became increasingly important as the majority of its top 200 clients had operations there.

Similarly, Eversheds pursued its African expansion strategy by signing a partnership agreement with existing relationship firm CWA Morocco, establishing new offices in Casablanca and Tangier in late March. Linklaters sealed an alliance with South African firm Webber Wentzel in December last year.

DLA Piper, meanwhile, in January added three new member firms to its now 14-country African network, Algerian firm B L & Associés, Rubeya & Co Advocates of Burundi and Namibian firm Ellis Shilengudwa, reflecting its active energy and project work in the region.

‘There’s a lot of interest [in Africa],’ says Hogan Lovells chief executive Steve Immelt. ‘The demand for infrastructure and resource is very high. There will be a lot of growth in particular regions, such as Southern Africa, as investment in education continues to increase and have an impact. [But] it’s too soon to tell. I wouldn’t move my chips off Asia quite yet.’

Global 100 Europe headcount (excl. London)

Rank Firm No. of lawyers in region % of lawyers in region
1 CMS 1,970 77%
2 DLA Piper 1,767 42%
3 Garrigues 1,567 98%
4 Fidal 1,324 100%
5 Clifford Chance 1,261 43%
6 Baker & McKenzie 1,192 29%
7 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 1,155 49%
8 Linklaters 1,040 41%
9 Allen & Overy 1,037 40%
10 Eversheds 929 69%
11 Pinsent Masons 840 56%
12 Hogan Lovells 782 31%
13 Loyens & Loeff 753 95%
14 White & Case 738 39%
15 Bird & Bird 726 66%
16 Squire Sanders 439 36%
17 Norton Rose Fulbright 417 12%
18 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton 372 28%
19 Jones Day 330 13%
20 Latham & Watkins 320 15%

Global 100 London headcount

Rank Firm No. of lawyers in region % of lawyers in region
1 Linklaters 989 39%
2 Allen & Overy 906 35%
3 Herbert Smith Freehills 864 36%
4 Clifford Chance 863 29%
5 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 794 34%
6 Slaughter and May 635 90%
7 Hogan Lovells 633 25%
8 Berwin Leighton Paisner 600 79%
9 CMS 563 22%
10 Norton Rose Fulbright 547 15%
11 Ashurst 520 30%
12 Pinsent Masons 507 34%
13 Clyde & Co 494 42%
14 Simmons & Simmons 448 54%
15 DLA Piper 410 10%
16 Baker & McKenzie 374 9%
17 Reed Smith 340 21%
18 White & Case 322 19%
19 Eversheds 305 23%
20 Bird & Bird 286 26%

Rounding Asia

Africa’s popularity may be rising but the rush into Asia hasn’t much abated. A host of international law firms sought to enhance their footprint on the continent since last year. Obviously the most prominent move since our Global 100 special last year was the tie-up of London’s SJ Berwin with Asia-Pacific giant King & Wood Mallesons (KWM), creating Asia’s largest Global 100 firm with combined revenues of over $1bn and 2,700 lawyers, including 550 partners. Having gone live on 1 November 2013, the deal gave SJ Berwin significant access within the Asia-Pacific market as KWM operates three separate partnerships in China, Hong Kong and Australia, though views remain sharply divided among peers regarding the union.

Meanwhile, in February Bird & Bird entered South Korea, Asia’s fourth largest economy, through a tie-up with local firm Hwang Mok Park. Baker & McKenzie made a further strategic push into Asia that same month and launched an office in Myanmar. Located in the city of Yangon, the latter’s venture is led by infrastructure and corporate partner Chris Hughes, who was previously based in Sydney.

Meanwhile, Singapore’s development as a regional hub for commercial law and arbitration in particular has continued despite ongoing tensions between international law firms and the local Ministry of Law, which has pressed foreign advisers to maintain a certain level of practice.

In February Allen & Overy (A&O), CC, Latham & Watkins, Norton Rose, and White & Case all successfully renewed their Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licences. Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) decided not to re-apply.

Most senior lawyers contacted for this article felt that Asia represented a key investment priority despite claims that it has become over-crowded as firms compete to hire a small pool of experienced commercial associates. They did, however, concede that the region is very much a long-term proposition.

Hogan Lovells’ outgoing joint-chief executive David Harris told Legal Business: ‘Asia is a massive growth market with huge potential.

‘The challenge in Asia is how to achieve greater market penetration, operate efficiently and profitably, and retain your good people. Suitably experienced lawyers, particularly Western educated, are in high demand.’

Norton Rose’s Martyr maintains that Asia is a crucial market for City-bred advisers. ‘It’s an integral part and incredibly important to London. Would London be as successful without Asia? Asia is a very important part of London.’

Evidence of such demand was illustrated in January when Magic Circle firm Slaughter and May took the unprecedented step of making a lateral hire, recruiting US securities partner John Moore from Morrison & Foerster into its Hong Kong office.

Global 100 Asia and Australia headcount

Rank Firm No. of lawyers in region % of lawyers in region
1 King & Wood Mallesons 1,925 79%
2 Herbert Smith Freehills 1,456 52%
3 Baker & McKenzie 1,049 26%
4 Ashurst 873 50%
5 Clayton Utz 823 100%
6 Minter Ellison 746 99%
7 Norton Rose Fulbright 740 21%
8 DLA Piper 681 16%
9 Clifford Chance 463 16%
10 K&L Gates 391 19%
11 Allen & Overy 390 15%
12 Linklaters 330 13%
13 Jones Day 237 10%
14 Hogan Lovells 214 8%
15 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 210 9%
16 Morrison & Foerster 179 17%
17 White & Case 166 9%
18 Squire Sanders 137 11%
19 Sidley Austin 137 8%
20 Reed Smith 128 8%

Global 100 US headcount

Rank Firm No. of lawyers in region % of lawyers in region
1 Jones Day 1,672 68%
2 Greenberg Traurig 1,521 90%
3 Sidley Austin 1,485 87%
4 Latham & Watkins 1,416 69%
5 Kirkland & Ellis 1,355 87%
6 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom 1,317 79%
7 K&L Gates 1,315 67%
8 DLA Piper 1,312 33%
9 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1,210 89%
10 Reed Smith 1,059 68%
11 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 1,017 88%
12 Littler Mendelson 952 95%
13 Holland & Knight 939 98%
14 Bryan Cave 935 95%
15 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr 889 90%
16 McGuireWoods 884 95%
17 Ropes & Gray 873 87%
18 Hogan Lovells 870 38%
19 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton 834 70%
20 Morrison & Foerster 811 80%

Euro bonds

In Europe, the most talked about trend is the continued drive by US law firms to recruit London partners. Our Global London survey in April indicated that a growing number of US firms are now not only making major investments in the City but also generating substantial profits and achieving growth rates beyond that of their home market.

Latham & Watkins, for instance, is an increasingly envied example. Since January, the Los Angeles-bred giant has made five lateral hires to its London office. In June it hired Macfarlanes environmental specialist Paul Davies as a partner in its environment, land and resources group. It also appointed Nick Benson from Weil, Gotshal & Manges; Kem Ihenacho from CC; Lucy Oddy from Berwin Leighton Paisner; and Tom Alabaster from The Carlyle Group. The office now has over 250 fee-earners, including 65 partners.

It is easy to see the advance made by top American firms with private equity and leverage finance proving a resurgent area alongside the increased presence of US advisers in London’s litigation scene. Other firms to maintain senior recruitment in 2013/14 include Reed Smith, which made five lateral hires since April 2013; Jones Day, which recruited five partners since last March; and Mayer Brown, which boosted its headcount by six since last September.

The overall outlook for Europe, however, remains uneven. There has generally been a more confident mood across major western markets, including powerhouse economies of France and Germany but also hard-hit southern European markets. However, Europe remains a choppy market and there is little sign of revival in the central and eastern European region.

In the spring, Norton Rose Fulbright and Hogan Lovells both announced they were pulling out of Prague following strategic reviews. It was the second time legacy City firm Norton Rose had exited the Czech capital, having previously closed its doors in the region in 1996.

Germany, likewise, remains a market of contrasting fortunes – profitable for many firms, but challenging for others. Hogan Lovells had to close its Berlin office after a nine-partner team led by M&A regulatory lawyer Christoph Wagner defected to US law firm Morrison & Foerster in September 2013, constituting Hogan Lovells’ entire partnership ranks in Berlin. Then in March, King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin shut its operations in the German capital followed by Sidley Austin, which confirmed it was closing its doors in Frankfurt in early June, leaving it without a German base.

During 2013 Shearman & Sterling closed two German offices to refocus its practice in Frankfurt after prolonged problems and losses in Europe’s largest economy.

Those feeling more positive about the prospects of Europe’s growing economies include CMS, Pinsent Masons and Edwards Wildman Palmer, which all established a presence in the fast-growing economy of Turkey, which is attracting increased interest from international companies and investors.

Sweeting says that CC’s improved financial performance was connected to the EMEA region. ‘The idea that growth is dead in the original key markets is wrong,’ he says. ‘Europe has stabilised. It faced an existential threat – that has disappeared and now there’s confidence about investment. Before no one wanted to do anything major. But it’s still a large chunk of our business.’

Global 100 Lawyers by Region

The ultimate prize

However significant the opportunities are in Europe and Asia, there is no doubt that for many leading UK firms the ultimate prize is to build a credible US practice.

Dentons global chief executive Elliott Portnoy, for example, argues that his firm is relatively undersized in the region and since its tripartite merger with Paris-based Salans and Canada’s Fraser Milner Casgrain, has attempted two more tie-ups with domestic US law firms: McKenna Long & Aldridge, and, more recently, Patton Boggs. Talks broke down with the former towards the end of last year while Patton Boggs went on to accept the merger offer of Squire Sanders in early June. But for Dentons, domestic expansion is still high on the agenda.

Portnoy comments: ‘We believe we are competitively undersized within the US. We’re the fifth largest in Europe and the sixth largest in Canada. But in the US we don’t have the headcount. In the coming months there will be more strategic growth in the US.’

Another case in point is the Magic Circle quartet Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, CC, Linklaters and A&O. The big four struggle to compete with leading US players and maintain a foothold of key clients in the region.

‘The US remains a big challenge for all Magic Circle firms,’ concedes A&O’s managing partner Wim Dejonghe. ‘We have seen improvement in business but we need to improve our market position compared to the domestic firms there. [While there has been] substantial progress in project finance, litigation, and antitrust, [it is] harder on domestic M&A and traditional banking – our product could be bigger and have more impact on the market.’

Linklaters is also gearing up for a renewed push in the US market. ‘China and India are long-term opportunities but the immediate opportunity from a revenue perspective is clearly the US, which has the most scope to grow,’ says Linklaters managing partner Simon Davies.

But the tough reality is that – even for firms with Linklaters’ resources and global credibility – there are no quick fixes for the US, while the last five years have seen US leaders advance globally at the expense of top London players.

One response has been the run of transatlantic tie-ups – such as last year’s union between Norton Rose and Fulbright & Jaworski and the creation of Hogan Lovells and Dentons. But the question remains whether top-tier City players have the stomach to attempt an audacious move in the US.

Martyr sums up the challenge: ‘Any movement in a big economy generates a lot of business, but there’s huge competition. Then you have the traditional legal phenomenon – the lemming approach – where firms say: “Oh, God, everybody has moved there, I better get out there too!” [But] the legal profession is undergoing significant change. It’s a different paradigm to the past when the economy boomed and everybody boomed with it. The boom cycle will have less of an impact.’ LB

sarah.downey@legalease.co.uk

Case study: Shearman & Sterling

Shearman & Sterling had fallen so far from its late-1990s’ glory days in New York and Europe that for many it had become a byword for a top-tier legal player that had lost its way.

As such, much talk of an assertive new direction under new senior partner Creighton Condon – who stepped in when predecessor Rohan Weerasinghe quit two years ago for Citigroup – was dismissed by rivals. With over 30% of Shearman’s revenues coming from Europe, the firm was also badly hit by the post-Lehman economic malaise in the eurozone, with revenues to the end of 2012 having fallen by 18% over the preceding five years.

However, the 2013 financial year went a long way to answering the firm’s critics, when Shearman saw a 9% hike in revenues to $820.3m, one of the strongest performances from a major US law firm during 2013, while profits per equity partner were up 19% to $1.8m. A resurgence in M&A work was central to this as the firm picked up work advising GE on its $4.3bn acquisition of aerospace-parts business Avio and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries on its $4bn purchase of Indian pharma firm Ranbaxy.

The firm’s London office, which Condon says ‘powered through the downturn while the rest of Europe felt the impact of the economic downturn more directly’, played a major role in handling big-ticket M&A activity, having represented Liberty Global on its $23.3bn acquisition of Virgin Media and metals group ArcelorMittal on its acquisition of ThyssenKrupp Steel USA through a joint venture partnership with Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation in a deal worth $1.55bn. Indeed, London outpaced a robust firm-wide performance with City revenues up more than 20% in 2013 – an important result for a firm with a strong heritage in the Square Mile. Condon says Shearman is still aiming for ‘aggressive’ growth in London.

And while many saw Shearman’s 2013 restructuring of its German practice – once a market-leader but which lost its way as the 2000s wore on – as a sign of its weakness, the New York firm argues that the shake-up, in which it closed its offices in Dusseldorf and Munich to focus on Frankfurt, has repositioned the practice in Germany and headed off substantial local losses.

Condon says a ‘real laser-focused, clients-first strategy was central to the growth this year’ as the firm’s litigation, finance and tax practices benefited from ‘developing additional business with clients we’ve traditional done M&A with’. He also argues that the firm’s willingness to invest while other firms were retrenching in recent years has finally paid off.

Shearman placed special emphasis on growing its historically underweight private equity and litigation practices and delved into the market to make 17 lateral hires between 1 May 2013 and 30 April 2014. Condon says that the arrival of private equity partners Mark Soundy, Sarah Priestley and Simon Burrows from Weil, Gotshal & Manges in London, has ‘energised the entire practice and has helped to round out resources we already had in New York, Paris, Italy, Germany and Hong Kong. We really needed that core London piece and we’ve felt a lot of benefits to this global link up in Asia’.

The return of Marwan Elaraby from private equity house Citadel Capital to head Shearman’s push in the Middle East alongside further hires in New York is also cited as part of a wider breakthrough in the sector.

However, the revolving door also saw key arbitration lawyers Todd Wetmore and Fernando Mantilla-Serrano leave for the Jan Paulsson-spearheaded arbitration boutique Three Crowns and Latham & Watkins, respectively. This is a setback to Condon’s plan to ‘capitalise on an extraordinary brand and take a very hard look at our disputes group, which has an extremely high quality but is relatively small in relation to our revenue base’.

The firm nevertheless made gains in its well regarded projects and leverage finance practices in 2013 and these continue to be areas of investment. Condon argues that a revived firm is now well positioned in terms of practice areas and geography and is continuing to benefit from a reviving economy. He comments: ‘London and New York are the two most vibrant legal markets and we’ll continue to focus on those two in particular.’

It will certainly take more than one strong year to sustain Shearman’s turnaround but the firm appears to have put itself right back in the contest.